November 2010 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Nov 1 11:48:33 CET 2010
Ending: Mon Nov 29 23:22:35 CET 2010
Messages: 325

• [tdwg-content] "Individual" use case   Dean Pentcheff
• [tdwg-content] "Individual" use case   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] "Individual" use case   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] [ExternalEmail] Re: [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Hilmar Lapp
• [tdwg-content] [ExternalEmail] Re: [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [ExternalEmail] Re: [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [ExternalEmail] Re: [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [ExternalEmail] Re: [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [Re: [tdwg-tag] class design, generalization, L(O)D] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [Re: [tdwg-tag] class design, generalization, L(O)D]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] [Re: [tdwg-tag] class design, generalization, L(O)D] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorshipin DwC scientificName: good or bad?   John van Breda
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorshipin DwC scientificName: good or bad?   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorshipin DwC scientificName: good or bad?   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   John van Breda
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   John van Breda
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   John van Breda
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Jonathan Giddy
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul van Rijckevorsel
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Niels Klazenga
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Niels Klazenga
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Roderic Page
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   John van Breda
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Paul van Rijckevorsel
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Chuck Miller
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Roderic Page
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Dmitry Mozzherin
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Dmitry Mozzherin
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Dmitry Mozzherin
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Dmitry Mozzherin
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Arturo H Ariño
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   greg whitbread
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad?   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwCscientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Markus Döring
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Bertram Ludaescher
• [tdwg-content] A question of Ranks [was: Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] An individual identified to a higher group like Order, is still an instance of a species - just a species that is currently unspecified   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] An individual identified to a higher group like Order, is still an instance of a species - just a species that is currently unspecified   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] An individual identified to a higher group like Order, is still an instance of a species - just a species that is currently unspecified   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] An individual identified to a higher group like Order, is still an instance of a species - just a species that is currently unspecified   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Assigned codes in published classifications   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 1. Denormalization of models and correspondence to the ASC model   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 2. Classes and types   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Kevin Richards
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Background for the Individual class proposal. 3. Should an Individual also be a Collecting Unit? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Call for Small Awards for Evaluating the GBIF Checklist Publication Format   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] class design, generalization, L(O)D   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] class design, generalization, L(O)D   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] class design, generalization, L(O)D   Thomas Bandholtz
• [tdwg-content] Comments on Cam's RDF practical details of recording a determination What is an Occurrence? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Comments on Cam's RDF practical details of recording a determination What is an Occurrence? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Comments on Cam's RDF practical details of recording a determination What is an Occurrence? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Comments on Cam's RDF practical details of recording a determination What is an Occurrence? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Comments on Cam's RDF practical details of recording a determination What is an Occurrence? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Tony.Rees at csiro.au
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] DwC-A taxonomic normaliser/standardiser - get paid to write requirements   David Remsen (GBIF)
• [tdwg-content] DwC-A taxonomic normaliser/standardiser - get paid to write requirements   Wolfgang Lorenz
• [tdwg-content] EEA use case   Thomas Bandholtz
• [tdwg-content] EEA use case   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] EEA use case   Thomas Bandholtz
• [tdwg-content] EEA use case   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] EEA use case   Thomas Bandholtz
• [tdwg-content] First Comments on the GBIF KOS Report   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] FOAF [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] FOAF [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] hasPart/isPartOf Re: tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName:good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   dipteryx at freeler.nl
• [tdwg-content] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Niels Klazenga
• [tdwg-content] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] newbie comments on Individual   Nate Flesness
• [tdwg-content] newbie comments on Individual   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Ontology   Lee Belbin
• [tdwg-content] Ontology   Roger Hyam
• [tdwg-content] Ontology   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Overloading of basisOfRecord and the DwC type vocabulary (includes DigitalStillImage term addition proposal)   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   "Markus Döring (GBIF)"
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Proposal to Add a GeoSpatial "Area" to the DarwinCore   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Reasoning with conditional OWL2 property chains [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Blum, Stan
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Lee Belbin
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Kevin Richards
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Roger Hyam
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Hilmar Lapp
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Hilmar Lapp
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Arlin Stoltzfus
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individualas a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a termwithin that class   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individual as a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a term within that class   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individualas a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a termwithin that class   Blum, Stan
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individualas a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a termwithin that class   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individualas a Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a termwithin that class   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Request for vote on proposals to add Individualasa Darwin Core class and to add the term individualRemarks as a termwithinthat class   Blum, Stan
• [tdwg-content] Request for withdrawal of proposal to move dwc:establishmentMeans to proposed the DwC class Individual   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Kevin Richards
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Nico Franz
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Taxon and Name [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] TaxonConcept Ontology, Test Data Set, SPARQL Endpoint, HTML and RDF representations   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Dusty
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Dusty
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] taxonomy != identification   Dusty
• [tdwg-content] TDWG and the Darwin Core   Jim Croft
• [tdwg-content] TDWG and the Darwin Core   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Dean Pentcheff
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Dean Pentcheff
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Nico Cellinese
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Dean Pentcheff
• [tdwg-content] tdwg-content Digest, Vol 20, Issue 17   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Treatise on Occurrence, tokens, and basisOfRecord [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Bertram Ludaescher
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Hilmar Lapp
• [tdwg-content] Unintentionally introducing classes. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Updated TaxonConcept Occurrence Examples   Peter DeVries
• [tdwg-content] Use case for individuals   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Paul Murray
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   greg whitbread
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Gregor Hagedorn
• [tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] What is dwc:basisOfRecord for?   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] What is dwc:basisOfRecord for?   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] What is dwc:basisOfRecord for?   Hilmar Lapp
• [tdwg-content] What is dwc:basisOfRecord for?   John Wieczorek
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Richard Pyle
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Steve Baskauf
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Bob Morris
• [tdwg-content] Why it matters what kind of things we include in the definition of Individual   Steve Baskauf

Last message date: Mon Nov 29 23:22:35 CET 2010
Archived on: Mon Nov 29 23:22:39 CET 2010

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...