![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3fa49a79150831ffc6ba05fd02972104.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
An individual identified to a higher group like Order, is still an instance of a species - just a species that is currently unspecified
by Peter DeVries 25 Sep '11
by Peter DeVries 25 Sep '11
25 Sep '11
3
5
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3fa49a79150831ffc6ba05fd02972104.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Does a species entail a specific classification or does it have many classifications.
by Peter DeVries 29 Nov '10
by Peter DeVries 29 Nov '10
29 Nov '10
6
13
1
0
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1c2f594b3e1a6501e6f47469440b403a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Call for Small Awards for Evaluating the GBIF Checklist Publication Format
by David Remsen (GBIF) 26 Nov '10
by David Remsen (GBIF) 26 Nov '10
26 Nov '10
1
0
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5b400e2f6e8253debaf1f882c6e2e990.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Re: [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?
by Chuck Miller 26 Nov '10
by Chuck Miller 26 Nov '10
26 Nov '10
12
53
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/74916746d2de0df9484e7a71ff162faf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Re: [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
by Paul Murray 23 Nov '10
by Paul Murray 23 Nov '10
23 Nov '10
13
34
5
11
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4f83ea038cd1355c76cacad4f68e34be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Re: [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?
by Tony.Rees@csiro.au 20 Nov '10
by Tony.Rees@csiro.au 20 Nov '10
20 Nov '10
12
18
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/30d85110917f84d5e96a6e78c82d4180.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Re: [tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?
by Jim Croft 20 Nov '10
by Jim Croft 20 Nov '10
20 Nov '10
3
2
1
0