- tdwg - lists.tdwg.org

Announcement: TDWG 2007 Annual Conference
by Adrian Rissone 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

Dear Colleague, Please accept our apologies for cross-posting of this announcement. In February we announced the dates and venue of the 2007 Annual Conference - Slovakia in September. Thanks to all those who have contributed since then to preparing the conference framework and the exciting programme. Information on the very full programme, travel, housing and submission of abstracts is now available here: http://www.tdwg.org/conference2007/ <http://www.tdwg.org/conference2007/> and the on-line registration site is active here: http://www.regonline.com/128305 <http://www.regonline.com/128305> Please help us prepare for the conference by registering as soon as possible - regular delegates will know how important this is - and be aware of the late registration fee. TDWG members who wish to pay their membership fees can pay them as part of the registration process in one easy transaction. Please note that the Conference registration fee for non-members is higher but that new members may join (or lapsed members pay their dues) and receive an immediate member discount. This will be an important conference. Don't miss it! Thank you for your interest in TDWG, Adrian Rissone Executive Secretary, TDWG Natural History Museum, London Phone +44 20 7942 5239 (voicemail only) Fax +44 20 7942 5546 E-mail a.rissone(a)nhm.ac.uk <mailto:a.rissone@nhm.ac.uk>

1 0

Biodiversity Information Projects - responses
by Lee Belbin 01 Jun '07

01 Jun '07

Dear list members Apologies for cross-postings. We have had an enthusiastic response to the database of biodiversity information related projects (http://www.tdwg.org/activities/bioinformatics-projects/) Thank you. We are now working on ways to improve the system based on your feedback and a few new ideas. Changes should happen quickly, unless they require a lot of work. We have now added definitions of the fields, will add the language of the project as a new field and deal with acronyms in some way. The projects can be of any size or scope (geographic or taxonomic or function), as long as the project deals with the discovery, description, indexing, aggregation, display or analysis/display of biodiversity data. Does that cover it? We have had a number of emails asking us to include unlisted projects. We can do that, but it is preferable to email the contact of the project and suggest they may like to create an entry. The project contacts will be able to generate a higher quality record that we can do. We will also keep adding new content and updating incomplete records. I will be away for a month so please contact Piers Higgs (piers(a)gaiaresources.com.au) with any questions, suggestions and feedback. Piers is however moving his office next week, so be patient for a response. Thank you Lee Lee Belbin Manager, TDWG Infrastructure Project Email: lee(a)tdwg.org Phone: +61(0)419 374 133

1 0

RE: [Taxacom] ITIS, Species 2000, etc.
by Lee Belbin 31 May '07

31 May '07

Dear TDWG list members I apologise to those on taxacom, but wanted to be sure that those interested in TDWG knew about this initiative... It occurred to me that it would be helpful to have a database along the lines of "Biodiversity information projects of the world". And with the help of Piers Higgs (http://www.gaiaresources.com.au/) - we have just in the last few days finished seeding one! http://www.tdwg.org/activities/bioinformatics-projects/ There are about 450 projects seeded in the database of which 295 are 'complete' for the fields that we have surveyed. There is also the ability to amend existing entries and add new entries. These changes/additions go into the database and a few people (including myself) are notified to evaluate these entries. We have the following fields in the database Project_name Project_logo Project_URL Project_description Project_type Date_start Date_end Contact_organisation Contact_person Contact_position Contact_email Key_inputs Key_infrastructure Key_technologies Key_processes Geographic_Scope Geographic_Type Taxonomic_Scope Taxonomic_Type Comments Finalised? Please give it a whirl! Input, amendments and feedback would be appreciated. Lee Lee Belbin Manager, TDWG Infrastructure Project Email: lee(a)tdwg.org Phone: +61(0)419 374 133 -----Original Message----- From: taxacom-bounces(a)mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces@mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Edwards, G.B. Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2007 12:46 AM To: taxacom(a)mailman.nhm.ku.edu Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ITIS, Species 2000, etc. I appreciate the comments of Anna, Mary, Rich, Rod and others on this subject, and the information links provided, but in many cases, those are for the one organization each is most associated with. Not that this isn't useful, but... Seems to me what we need is an Encyclopedia of Taxonomic Initiatives (or maybe a Reader's Digest Version) which would give us the acronym or title, what it means, what it's purpose is, where it's located, and who it's contact people are (see those listed below plus a "whole host of other initiatives", many of which have come up in subsequent discussions). Also needed is a glossary of acronyms used within each organization. Obviously people who are already involved know what these initiatives are, but I suspect there are many others who might want to be involved in something, but don't want to wade through looking up the specs for a bunch of organizations to find one that seems to fit what they would be willing to do. Not to mention how helpful it would be to know the most appropriate place to go for a particular type of taxonomic information, or to find out that there actually is an organization that databases some obscure group. Yes, you can Google, but then you're still wading through thousands of responses, and you'll probably miss some of the initiatives. There are just too many for any one person to keep track of. How about if the organizers of every initiative send in their information to a central website which can then be made available to everyone (offers to host?). Maybe some of the paralysis will be lifted if people know what their options are. Might bring some of those private collections into the fold. Might even be a good start to organizing the taxonomic community. -- G. B. Edwards Florida State Collection of Arthropods ...One of the goals of the Encyclopedia of Life is to work with groups like uBio, GBIF, ITIS, Species2000, IPNI, Index Fungorum, ZooBank, BHL, and a whole host of other initiatives who deal with taxonomic names to establish what David Remsen of GBIF calls the "BIG Index" (I'll defer to David for elaboration of the name). This would be a giant index of these "usage instances", or the "facts" of taxonomy, as I defined them above (e.g., Smith, 2001, treated "Aus xus" as a junior synonym of "Aus bus"). Building such a comprehensive index is a monumental task, far outside the scope of any single initiative like ITIS or Species2000 or most of the others. But it's not outside the scope of the collective taxonomic community as a whole; which is why ideas like All Species, GBIF's ECAT, and EoL (the latter being the most robustly funded) are so fundamentally important to serve as a "flag pole" around which we can all congregate and coordinate our efforts. ... I share your feeling that paralysis is the usual response. What continually astounds me is how little people are aware of the groundwork that already exists. Most of the issues (GUIDs, generating identifiers, searching based on journal metadata) have already been solved, in some cases (SICIs, OpenURL) a decade ago.

1 0

FW: [Conservation Commons] Biodiversity standards project aims for better government and business decisions
by Lee Belbin 30 May '07

30 May '07

Dear Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) list members I thought the following post to the Conservation Commons list should be of broad interest. Éamonn O Tuama of GBIF and I (representing TDWG) attended the first of the IUCN-OASIS meeting in Gland last month (see http://www.tdwg.org/homepage-news-item/article/lee-attends-iucn-oasis-worksh op-on-biodiversity-standards/). A second meeting hosted by Conservation International in Arlington is planned for June 26 . Éamonn and I plan to attend. I've made the suggestion to Tom Hammond of IUCN that a key requirement before this meeting is a set of use-cases. Recent initiatives on interoperability standards for biodiversity data such as this one in IUCN, EoL and the ILTER are generating a healthy pressure for TDWG to have quality packaged solutions that address client needs. I'm keen to hear any other comments from list members about key issues that should be presented or positions taken. Cheers Lee Lee Belbin Manager, TDWG Infrastructure Project Email: lee(a)tdwg.org Phone: +61(0)419 374 133 _____ From: Chucri Sayegh [mailto:chucri.sayegh@iucn.org] Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2007 12:24 AM To: biod_commons(a)indaba.iucn.org Subject: [Conservation Commons] Biodiversity standards project aims for better government and business decisions source : http://www.ictstandardization.com/news/200705/article20070564.html Biodiversity standards project aims for better government and business decisions An IUCN/OASIS biodiversity project aims to better tap the vast sea of statistical data on endangered species and protected areas for better information sharing and decisions by business and government. One of the huge challenges in biodiversity conservation is managing the vast quantities of data generated so people can use it, said Tom Hammond, senior program advisor at The World Conservation Union (IUCN). Much biodiversity data is either unavailable or not easily accessible because of fragmentation of data, lack of access or interoperability, IUCN said. The US Geological Surveys National Biodiversity Information Infrastructure (NBII) program is essentially tackling domestically, the same questions that the IUCN/OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) partnership is at the international level, trying to integrate all the biodiversity data and information generated at county level and federally, into one common [information] infrastructure, Hammond said: NBII is part of this process. Canada and other of IUCN's 80 member countries are essentially trying to do the same thing, Hammond said. Many initiatives to improve access to and leveraging of biodiversity data are taking place in governments, scientific and research organizations and in the private sector, Hammond said: Very few of these initiatives are talking to each other." Biodiversity information could be accessed in common ways no matter where the information is being maintained, Patrick Gannon, president and CEO of OASIS said: Data gets managed wherever its best gathered and managed. Organizations that need the data shouldnt need multiple kinds of interfaces to access it, Gannon said. This is a common refrain that many, particularly companies in the resource sector oil and gas, mining, forests, agriculture many companies are beginning to step up and say, they need to make better, more informed decisions about where they conduct their business on the ground, Hammond said. Seventy-six organizations have committed to open access to biodiversity data by signing up to a global partnership called the Conservation Commons, Hammond said. They are conservation groups, scientific organizations, government agencies like NASA and NBII, companies like Rio Tinto, Shell and Chevron, Hammond said: From a private sector companys point of view, thats fairly significant because that gets down to issues of disclosure. Many of these companies generate their own data when it comes to their field operations and these companies have formally signed up to say they will make available the data that they generate for whatever field operations theyre involved in." Geospatial approaches will be the platform upon which were going to generate a lot of this work, because the data is from some geographic place on the planet, Hammond said: Essentially what were doing is identifying the minimum standards we need so we can at least share data. The work builds on open standards from the Open Geospatial Consortium, global and regional species taxonomy standards, on-line publishing and referencing, Service Oriented Architectures and others, IUCN said. The work of a group called Biodiversity Information Standards will also be involved. The first step in the process will be identifying what standards work is out there that can be leveraged and whats missing, Hammond said: Theres a minimum list of criteria that you absolutely have to have access to if youre a CEO or a director of a government ministry making a decision. Endangered species, protected areas, key biodiversity areas outside of protected areas, critical ecosystems for the generation of ecosystem goods and services like water, fiber, maintaining soils and non-timber forest products is a very short list of some very key ecosystem and biodiversity elements that we would like to make sure that anyone would have access to, Hammond said. A June meeting in Arlington, Virginia (USA) will begin to tackle the issues. There will be 3 major thrusts: 1) Species; 2) Habitat; 3) Biodiversity conservation vocabulary, which deals with scientific publishing. OASIS and IUCN have been working together for about a year, Gannon said. OASIS will form a Biodiversity Conservation Member Section to work with IUCNs Biodiversity Conservation Standards initiative and the Conservation Commons, IUCN said. An OASIS steering committee will identify various data standards committees and the order that the work progresses. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Reply button in your e-mail program sends your reply to the person posting a message, not to the list. ATTENTION Please: if the message to which you are replying is long, please delete as much of it from your reply as possible to reduce message lengths for other List subscribers. Thank You. To contact the list owners: BioD_Commons-owner(a)indaba.iucn.org To leave this list, send a blank message to: BioD_Commons-leave(a)indaba.iucn.org WWW archives: http://indaba.iucn.org/archives/biod_commons/ The username and password are available from BioD_Commons-owner(a)indaba.iucn.org This message was sent to you at: lee(a)tdwg.org The services and facilities to support this list are provided by The Information Management Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

1 0

Brochures
by Lee Belbin 21 May '07

21 May '07

Dear list members Two tri-fold A4 brochures (in PDF format) have been prepared- * Recruiting <http://www.tdwg.org/fileadmin/executive/TDWG_Brochure.pdf> members and * Recruiting <http://www.tdwg.org/fileadmin/executive/TDWG_Brochure_IT.pdf> 'information technologists' The latter was considered due to a lack of depth in technical skills in areas where we anticipate considerable pressures due to demand (and where we also fear for the sanity of a number of our overworked members :). Please be encouraged to distribute these brochures far and wide. If anyone wants to print a batch for use at conferences and meetings, please contact me. Thanks Lee Lee Belbin Manager, TDWG Infrastructure Project Email: lee(a)tdwg.org Phone: +61(0)419 374 133

1 0

New Executive Summary document for TAPIR
by Lee Belbin 17 May '07

17 May '07

Dear List Members The TDWG Infrastructure Project sponsored Renato De Giovanni to write a 2-page Executive Summary of TAPIR, now available at- http://www.tdwg.org/dav/subgroups/tapir/1.0/docs/TAPIRExecutiveSummary_2007_ 05_12.html I have also commissioned two pilot video clips similar to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NwfGA4cxJQ I'd be very interested hearing from other Conveners about doing similar documents for other TDWG standards and related activities. I'm also keen to get feedback about broader promotion of such 'high-level' introductions. Should we post these to taxacom for example? It may be nice to have some content:) Also, expect an excellent introduction to LSIDs from the recent Canberra LSID Policy Workshop, soon. And a neat geointeroperability demo.... Cheers Lee Lee Belbin Manager, TDWG Infrastructure Project Email: lee(a)tdwg.org Phone: +61(0)419 374 133

1 0

European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature - Requirements Survey
by Charles Hussey 09 May '07

09 May '07

(Already posted to TAXACOM, so apologies if you have already seen this - CGH) The European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT) is a Network of Excellence project, funded by the EU for 5 years (http://www.e-taxonomy.eu/) One of the deliverables of the project will be a Bibliographic Resource to be known as the European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature (E-ViTL). This part of the project is being managed by the Natural History Museum, London and we are in the process of defining detailed specifications for such a service. We are keen (naturally!) to ensure that the service will meet actual user needs and so, if this is an area dear to your heart, you are warmly invited to participate in an online survey at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=999183808985 (the survey will close at midnight on 11th May) This will ensure that your views are taken into account. NOTE: E-ViTL is likely to be a resource discovery tool rather than a repository of full text articles. It could, however, point users to repositories, such as the Biodiversity Heritage Library (http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org) online journals and other sources. There is some debate over whether E-ViTL should attempt to provide reference management functions, in addition to providing access to literature. Also whether it should be a repository for reference lists, rather than a portal to search distributed repositories. However, the purpose of this survey is to gather user requirements and, although it is unlikely that E-ViTL will be able to incorporate all possible requirements, your views will provide a useful pointer for future development. Yours sincerely, Charles Hussey, Science Data Co-ordinator, Data and Digital Systems Team, Library and Information Services, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD United Kingdom

2 1

FW: [Taxacom] European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature - Requirements Survey
by Charles Hussey 04 May '07

04 May '07

Dear Rod, Thank you for your pertinent comments. The questions for the online survey were formulated following brainstorming sessions with colleagues at the Natural History Museum, London and during the EDIT WP6 meeting last week. My aim, at this stage, is to capture actual user requirements (a wish-list, if you like) and the resulting report may hopefully be of use beyond EDIT (informing BHL and development routes for Commercial products, for instance). I am not sure that EDIT WP5 has the resources to develop a bespoke solution and it is likely that (due to time pressure, amongst other factors) we may go with an 'off-the-shelf' solution - which will probably only be able to deliver a reduced set of our requirements. Nevertheless, in gathering the requirements, we may have a roadmap for the future. EDIT is all about integration and making the process of taxonomic research and publication more efficient. Core to this, will be providing tools for taxonomists working together on a particular group to discover and collate relevant bibliographic resources, to classify them, and share them. Obviously there are several different architectures that could be deployed - I don't want to be prescriptive and it is very interesting to see the different suggestions being offered. If we had been having this debate even two years ago, the possibilities (and solutions) would have been different, and in 2 - 5 years from now, they will be different again. The challenge to discern what is achievable within the scope (and lifetime) of the EDIT opportunity, whilst also producing a legacy that is scalable, sustainable and can evolve together with changing taxonomic practice and available technology. Regards, Charles Hussey, Science Data Co-ordinator, Data and Digital Systems Team, Library and Information Services, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0)207 942 5213 Fax. +44 (0)207 942 5559 e-mail c.hussey(a)nhm.ac.uk Species Dictionary project: www.nhm.ac.uk/nbn/ Nature Navigator: www.nhm.ac.uk/naturenavigator/ -----Original Message----- From: Roderic Page [mailto:r.page@bio.gla.ac.uk] Sent: 04 May 2007 13:15 To: Charles Hussey Cc: 'Taxacom'; tdwg(a)lists.tdwg.org; Vincent Smith Subject: Re: [Taxacom] European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature - Requirements Survey Some quick comments: This survey suggests the potential for a project that, in my opinion, is far too big and unwieldy. I suggest focussing on a core set of functions, and leave the rest to projects that do this sort of thing much better. I think the two most important things this project could do are: 1. provide an OpenURL service that will resolve a bibliographic citation (or a GUID) 2. provide GUIDs (e.g., SICIs and BICIs) that cost nothing for articles, books, and book chapters, and provide a resolver for these GUIDs. 3. provide a service to parse bibliographic citations (along the lines of Paratools). If you have 1, then you have a web service that people can use. For example, Connotea users can specify an OpenURL resolver to try and find an article online. By default it is CrossRef's service, which relies on DOIs. Imaging having a service that also supports literature that uses other GUIDs (such as Handles and SICIs). If you have 2, then everything in this project has a URI and therefore exists on the web (or, at least it's metadata does). This is one of the motivations behind the bioGUID project. If you have 3, then you have a service that would be useful in automatically integrating bibliographies from a range of sources (e.g., parsing lists of the literature on the web, or in bibliographies of papers). In terms of a portal, etc., in an age of Connotea this seems wasted effort -- they do this sort of thing well, why duplicate effort? Community tagging, etc., relies of communities, and Connotea already has one. The other lesson to learn from Connotea is that relies on existing web services, such as CrossRef's OpenURL resolver (to extract metadata associated with a DOI), and NCBI's PubMed service. By using these services, the developers could concentrate on other things. What I an arguing is that if you develop services, the "portal" (or whatever) becomes either (a) easy, or (b) largely irrelevant because you can use existing tools. Regards Rod On 3 May 2007, at 17:08, Charles Hussey wrote: > The European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT) is a Network of > Excellence project, funded by the EU for 5 years > (http://www.e-taxonomy.eu/) One of the deliverables of the project > will be a Bibliographic Resource to be known as the European Virtual > Library of Taxonomic Literature (E-ViTL). > > This part of the project is being managed by the Natural History > Museum, London and we are in the process of defining detailed > specifications for such a service. We are keen (naturally!) to ensure > that the service will meet actual user needs and so, if this is an > area dear to your heart, you are warmly invited to participate in an > online survey at: > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?A=193016818E830 (the survey will > close at midnight on 11th May) > > This will ensure that your views are taken into account. > > NOTE: E-ViTL is likely to be a resource discovery tool rather than a > repository of full text articles. It could, however, point users to > repositories, such as the Biodiversity Heritage Library > (http://bhl.si.edu/) online journals and other sources. > > There is some debate over whether E-ViTL should attempt to provide > reference management functions, in addition to providing access to > literature. Also whether it should be a repository for reference > lists, rather than a portal to search distributed repositories. > However, the purpose of this survey is to gather user requirements > and, although it is unlikely that E-ViTL will be able to incorporate > all possible requirements, your views will provide a useful pointer > for future development. > > Yours sincerely, > > Charles Hussey, > > Science Data Co-ordinator, > Data and Digital Systems Team, > Library and Information Services, > Natural History Museum, > Cromwell Road, > London SW7 5BD > United Kingdom > > Tel. +44 (0)207 942 5213 > Fax. +44 (0)207 942 5559 > e-mail c.hussey(a)nhm.ac.uk > Species Dictionary project: www.nhm.ac.uk/nbn/ Nature Navigator: > www.nhm.ac.uk/naturenavigator/ > > _______________________________________________ > Taxacom mailing list > Taxacom(a)mailman.nhm.ku.edu > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- Professor Roderic D. M. Page Editor, Systematic Biology DEEB, IBLS Graham Kerr Building University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QP United Kingdom Phone: +44 141 330 4778 Fax: +44 141 330 2792 email: r.page(a)bio.gla.ac.uk web: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html iChat: aim://rodpage1962 reprints: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/pubs.html Subscribe to Systematic Biology through the Society of Systematic Biologists Website: http://systematicbiology.org Search for taxon names: http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/portal/ Find out what we know about a species: http://ispecies.org Rod's rants on phyloinformatics: http://iphylo.blogspot.com Rod's rants on ants: http://semant.blogspot.com

2 1

Re: [Taxacom] European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature - Requirements Survey
by Roderic Page 04 May '07

04 May '07

Some quick comments: This survey suggests the potential for a project that, in my opinion, is far too big and unwieldy. I suggest focussing on a core set of functions, and leave the rest to projects that do this sort of thing much better. I think the two most important things this project could do are: 1. provide an OpenURL service that will resolve a bibliographic citation (or a GUID) 2. provide GUIDs (e.g., SICIs and BICIs) that cost nothing for articles, books, and book chapters, and provide a resolver for these GUIDs. 3. provide a service to parse bibliographic citations (along the lines of Paratools). If you have 1, then you have a web service that people can use. For example, Connotea users can specify an OpenURL resolver to try and find an article online. By default it is CrossRef's service, which relies on DOIs. Imaging having a service that also supports literature that uses other GUIDs (such as Handles and SICIs). If you have 2, then everything in this project has a URI and therefore exists on the web (or, at least it's metadata does). This is one of the motivations behind the bioGUID project. If you have 3, then you have a service that would be useful in automatically integrating bibliographies from a range of sources (e.g., parsing lists of the literature on the web, or in bibliographies of papers). In terms of a portal, etc., in an age of Connotea this seems wasted effort -- they do this sort of thing well, why duplicate effort? Community tagging, etc., relies of communities, and Connotea already has one. The other lesson to learn from Connotea is that relies on existing web services, such as CrossRef's OpenURL resolver (to extract metadata associated with a DOI), and NCBI's PubMed service. By using these services, the developers could concentrate on other things. What I an arguing is that if you develop services, the "portal" (or whatever) becomes either (a) easy, or (b) largely irrelevant because you can use existing tools. Regards Rod On 3 May 2007, at 17:08, Charles Hussey wrote: > The European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT) is a Network of > Excellence project, funded by the EU for 5 years > (http://www.e-taxonomy.eu/) One of the deliverables of the project > will > be a Bibliographic Resource to be known as the European Virtual Library > of Taxonomic Literature (E-ViTL). > > This part of the project is being managed by the Natural History > Museum, > London and we are in the process of defining detailed specifications > for > such a service. We are keen (naturally!) to ensure that the service > will > meet actual user needs and so, if this is an area dear to your heart, > you are warmly invited to participate in an online survey at: > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?A=193016818E830 (the survey will > close > at midnight on 11th May) > > This will ensure that your views are taken into account. > > NOTE: E-ViTL is likely to be a resource discovery tool rather than a > repository of full text articles. It could, however, point users to > repositories, such as the Biodiversity Heritage Library > (http://bhl.si.edu/) online journals and other sources. > > There is some debate over whether E-ViTL should attempt to provide > reference management functions, in addition to providing access to > literature. Also whether it should be a repository for reference lists, > rather than a portal to search distributed repositories. However, the > purpose of this survey is to gather user requirements and, although it > is unlikely that E-ViTL will be able to incorporate all possible > requirements, your views will provide a useful pointer for future > development. > > Yours sincerely, > > Charles Hussey, > > Science Data Co-ordinator, > Data and Digital Systems Team, > Library and Information Services, > Natural History Museum, > Cromwell Road, > London SW7 5BD > United Kingdom > > Tel. +44 (0)207 942 5213 > Fax. +44 (0)207 942 5559 > e-mail c.hussey(a)nhm.ac.uk > Species Dictionary project: www.nhm.ac.uk/nbn/ > Nature Navigator: www.nhm.ac.uk/naturenavigator/ > > _______________________________________________ > Taxacom mailing list > Taxacom(a)mailman.nhm.ku.edu > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- Professor Roderic D. M. Page Editor, Systematic Biology DEEB, IBLS Graham Kerr Building University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QP United Kingdom Phone: +44 141 330 4778 Fax: +44 141 330 2792 email: r.page(a)bio.gla.ac.uk web: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html iChat: aim://rodpage1962 reprints: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/pubs.html Subscribe to Systematic Biology through the Society of Systematic Biologists Website: http://systematicbiology.org Search for taxon names: http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/portal/ Find out what we know about a species: http://ispecies.org Rod's rants on phyloinformatics: http://iphylo.blogspot.com Rod's rants on ants: http://semant.blogspot.com

1 0

TDWG 2007: 16-22 September, Bratislava, Slovakia
by Adrian Rissone 04 May '07

04 May '07

Preparations for the Annual Conference of Biodiversity Information Standards (formerly known as the Taxonomic Databases Working Group) are progressing well. The meeting will be held at a Conference Centre in the city of Bratislava, Slovakia, kindly hosted by the Department of Zoology of the Comenius University. The dates are confirmed as: Sunday 16 September: Arrival of delegates; Meeting of the Executive (no formal sessions) Monday 17 September - Wednesday 19 September: General sessions Thursday 20 September - Friday 21 September: Symposium Saturday 21 September: Informal Interest Group sessions if required; Departure of delegates These dates have been chosen partly because to secure space at the Conference Centre, partly to avoid conflict with other meetings that delegates may wish to attend (sorry - we can't avoid everything!). Over the next few weeks full details of the Conference (Themes, draft Programme, Registration, Accommodation) will become available on the web site at: http://www.tdwg.org/conference2007/ If you are not already registered on the TDWG website please do so. We will be using the registration membership list for the distribution of Conference information. http://www.tdwg.org/membership/ <http://www.tdwg.org/membership/> Please note that it is possible to register with TDWG *without* becoming a paying member. Obviously, we would welcome you as a full member and encourage you to join, but recognise that you may not wish to join at this time. We look forward to seeing you in Bratislava! Regards, Adrian Rissone Executive Secretary and Chair of the TDWG 2007 Conference Committee

1 0