[tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies

Roger Hyam rogerhyam at mac.com
Sat Nov 13 11:17:56 CET 2010


I think we need a mother of all points at the beginning

0) Clearly defined use-cases/scenarios/competency questions that have enough detail to act as tests of any proposed solutions. Without these we will continue to bob around in the sea of good ideas and never arrive at any destination.

Who is it for? What will it enable them to do? Do they want/need to do it? 


On 13 Nov 2010, at 08:30, Kevin Richards <RichardsK at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:

> 'Effective tools' to do X, Y & Z always seem to be on the agenda, but I'm not sure it is the tools that are the hold up.  Unfortunately I think it boils down to funding... I'm sure if we had adequate funding to get people together for the required length of time, working on the right stuff etc, etc, then we would make fantastic progress. 
> 
> I'm thinking a really good session with a basic UML tool would be a big step forward.  I have got hold of a UML tool and intend to have a go at a core tdwg model.  I think it would be great then if we could organise a session on working on this model.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> Sent from my HTC
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Lee Belbin" <leebelbin at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Nov 13, 2010 3:42 pm
> Subject: [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies
> To: "tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org" <tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org>
> 
> Well stated Stan, but I'd add a third-
> 
> 3. Effective tool/s for viewing (graph, sub-graph, tables, properties etc.),
> add/delete/modify with adaptable governance control (e.g., assigned management
> to sub-graph domains), annotate (with full logging of who did what, when and
> how...). This is in effect a collaboration tool.
> 
> Until we have a tool (preferable to tools) that can be intuitive and effective
> for building, managing and deploying /exporting vocabs or ontologies, we will
> struggle with this socially and technically tough, but very necessary task. The
> social issues are the hardest, but an effective collaboration tool would be a
> big help.
> 
> A tool that will be readily embraced  by #2 (the domain specialists) seems far
> more important than the tools I've seen so far that are embraced by #1 (e.g.
> Protégé).
> 
> That we don't have a TDWG ontology is an increasing worry.
> 
> Lee
> 
> Lee Belbin
> Geospatial Team Leader
> Atlas of Living Australia
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org
> [mailto:tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Blum, Stan
> Sent: Saturday, 13 November 2010 9:43 AM
> To: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] Relation of GNA to TDWG vocabularies
> 
> Progress on the TDWG ontology seems to require:
> 
> 1) one or more people with good sense of what can be done with ontologies, both
> in the near-term and long-term; and
> 2) one or more people who understand the way information is partitioned in this
> domain and how it could fit together.
> 
> I think we have a lot of #2, but not many of #1.
> 
> FYI, we have seed money to bring these categories together.
> 
> -Stan
> 
> 
> On 11/12/10 2:25 PM, "Bob Morris" <morris.bob at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Richard Pyle 
> > <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> [...] the current status of the TDWG-Ontology efforts.  The Google 
> >> Code website seems a bit anemic,
> > 
> > Ooh, I love that line.  I think I'll put it in the script of my next 
> > animation, to be titled: "Alpha and Beta discuss the current status of 
> > of the TDWG-Ontology efforts"
> > 
> > Thanks for correcting the URL.
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> > 
> > Robert A. Morris
> > Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science UMASS-Boston
> > 100 Morrissey Blvd
> > Boston, MA 02125-3390
> > Associate, Harvard University Herbaria
> > email: morris.bob at gmail.com
> > web: http://bdei.cs.umb.edu/
> > web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
> > http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
> > phone (+1) 857 222 7992 (mobile)
> > _______________________________________________
> > tdwg-content mailing list
> > tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email
> Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
> The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20101113/f3fe74a2/attachment.html 


More information about the tdwg-content mailing list