[tdwg-tag] SourceForge LSID project websites broken - role for TDWG?

Gregor Hagedorn g.m.hagedorn at gmail.com
Mon Mar 23 14:15:59 CET 2009


I agree with Roger about the technical side. LSIDs are largely for
insiders with good IT support, preferably building their software
themselves. In a way, there is a social business model associated with
LSIDs: keep it a small and thus perhaps better manageable community.
However this comes at the cost of excluding many initiatives,
especially those relying on unmodified or only slightly modified
standard software.

>>>From biologists-social standpoint I would argue that:

  urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8BDC0735-FEA4-4298-83FA-D04F67C3FBEC

is far harder than this:

http://purl.zoobank.org/8BDC0735-FEA4-4298-83FA-D04F67C3FBEC

which, socially, and for people who might want to cite identifiers in
paper or PDF form, is harder than this:

  http://persistent-id.zoobank.org/8BDC0735-FEA4-4298-83FA-D04F67C3FBEC
or
  http://persistent-identifier.zoobank.org/8BDC0735-FEA4-4298-83FA-D04F67C3FBEC

I just try argue to speak to the communities outside of the inner
technological circle, rather than saving a few characters.

These people may also be the managers, making it clear that this class
of URLs need to be managed over longer time periods.

Gregor



More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list