[tdwg-content] Best practice for scientificNameAuthorship?
Markus Döring
m.doering at mac.com
Wed Feb 25 12:49:46 CET 2015
Hi Andréa,
ideally you would only publish the infraspecific author in both the scientificName and scientificNameAuthorship which is also recommended by the codes as far as I am aware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Author_citation_(botany)#Authorship_of_subsidiary_ranks
best,
Markus
On 25 Feb 2015, at 12:42, Andréa Matsunaga <ammatsun at ufl.edu> wrote:
> Dear experts.
>
> What is the best practice for the DwC scientificNameAuthorship when
> there is a specific epithet author as well as infraspecific epithet
> author in a scientific name? Both names concatenated by some character?
> Only the infraspecific epithet author?
> Both pieces of information would go into DwC scientificname, but
> I'm looking for how users would use scientificNameAuthorship and what is
> useful to have there.
>
> Thank you,
> --am
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20150225/bc9bf570/attachment.html
More information about the tdwg-content
mailing list