[tdwg-content] New term needs resolution: yearOfPublication
Nico Cellinese
ncellinese at flmnh.ufl.edu
Tue Jul 5 01:59:27 CEST 2011
Thanks Greg! Can I second that heartily? It is VERY important to have yearofpublication for reasons that may not be apparent now, but will be as soon as the PhyloCode hits the shelves (next year). So thanks for including that.
nico
On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
> I second this request. In the absence of a widely accepted
> nomenclatural standard, DwC is and should be used for basic exchange
> of nomenclatural information. I consider yearOfPublication important
> in this respect.
>
> Gregor
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
More information about the tdwg-content
mailing list