[tdwg-content] New term needs resolution: yearOfPublication

Nico Cellinese ncellinese at flmnh.ufl.edu
Tue Jul 5 01:59:27 CEST 2011

Thanks Greg!  Can I second that heartily? It is VERY important to have  yearofpublication for reasons that may not be apparent now, but will be as soon as the PhyloCode hits the shelves (next year). So thanks for including that.


On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:

> I second this request. In the absence of a widely accepted
> nomenclatural standard, DwC is and should be used for basic exchange
> of nomenclatural information. I consider yearOfPublication important
> in this respect.
> Gregor
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content

More information about the tdwg-content mailing list