[tdwg-content] Use of TCS [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[greg whitbread]

Gregor,

Should we consider a TCS version 2 with this capability?

greg

On 25 November 2010 23:54, Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn at gmail.com> wrote:

> About the problem of being unable to use fragments: SDD provides two
> root schemata, one that allows only valid "complete" datasets, another
> allowing fragments. ("object interchange..."). Under the assumptions
> of xml-schema, it is perfectly legal to have schema-validation
> variants for differnt purposes.
>
> It was originally planned to merge the xml-standards (TCS, SDD, ABCD)
> into one unified one, thus introducing such mechanisms (and extension
> mechanisms like in SDD) into all. This was stopped by the TDWG
> executive in favor of redesigning everything as RDF vocabularies
> instead of xml-schema.  So the xml-schema standards are somewhat poor
> orphans... :-)
>
> Gregor
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>
>
> If you have received this transmission in error please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any
> attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute
> waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of
> information in the e-mail or attachments.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>



-- 
Greg Whitbread
Australian National Botanic Gardens
Australian National Herbarium
+61 2 62509482
ghw at anbg.gov.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20101126/9b4e9c3c/attachment.html