[tdwg-content] year of publication
RichardsK at landcareresearch.co.nz
Thu Oct 15 05:13:25 CEST 2009
Ok. That was my assumption. Some people are a bit picky about it though. But fine by me.
From: Richard Pyle [mailto:deepreef at bishopmuseum.org]
Sent: Thursday, 15 October 2009 4:11 p.m.
To: Kevin Richards; tuco at berkeley.edu
Cc: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
Subject: RE: [tdwg-content] year of publication
> Also, what was the justification for combining nomenclature
> and taxonomic data together into the one dwc:Taxon class?
I think it makes sense to combine them, because there is so much overlap.
Both are much more similar to each other than either is to, say, specimens,
literature, or geography.
Please consider the environment before printing this email
Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
More information about the tdwg-content