[tdwg-content] year of publication

[John R. WIECZOREK]

For picky people it shouldn't really matter as the association with
the class Taxon is a loose one, made only via the organizedInClass
attribute - in rdf:

<dwcattributes:organizedInClass
rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Taxon"/>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Kevin Richards
<RichardsK at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:
> Ok. That was my assumption.  Some people are a bit picky about it though.  But fine by me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Pyle [mailto:deepreef at bishopmuseum.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 15 October 2009 4:11 p.m.
> To: Kevin Richards; tuco at berkeley.edu
> Cc: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> Subject: RE: [tdwg-content] year of publication
>
>
>> Also, what was the justification for combining nomenclature
>> and taxonomic data together into the one dwc:Taxon class?
>
> I think it makes sense to combine them, because there is so much overlap.
> Both are much more similar to each other than either is to, say, specimens,
> literature, or geography.
>
> Aloha,
> Rich
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email
> Warning:  This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
> The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
>