Hi all,
Thank you so much to all who have contributed to the manuscript. *For the
ones that are still interested in contributing, please remember you have
time until Feb 3 (MS here
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I7RRu6mj7u53-zz6c_8ZIYqLsNMA0o6VwP3fuST…>).
*Ideally, I would have some time to go through your comments and
consolidate them before our *meeting on Wednesday 5 at 12 UTC. *
*If you have conflicts with the time of the meeting (I maintained the
original meeting date and time), please let me know and I am more than
happy to meet separately or coordinate differently.*
The success of next week's meeting is highly dependent on your input so
reading the current state of the manuscript would be beneficial. The
proposed agenda for the meeting is below but it is quite flexible regarding
new comments or insight collected during the upcoming week, so please share
freely.
*Proposed agenda (wed 5)*
- Figures, particularly Fig 1 since the message is still not clear.
- Structure of sections and content, in particular regarding how to handle
the case studies.
- Sections or categories in which the terms have been organized. Current
classes are described in https://eco.tdwg.org/terms/. Some of them may not
be intuitive and we might need to double-check these.
- Next steps regarding journals and potentially approaching editors in
advance
- Consensus on repeated terms or concepts (data collection process,
inventory types, etc)
Thank you again, and see you next week!
All the best,
Yani
Wow! I love all this activity! Thank you all and particularly Wesley for
your inputs!!
Between Tuesday and Wednesday and I can definitely work on current
comments. I will let you know when I finish so Rob and others can review.
Thanks again! See you next week
Yani
On Mon 27. Jan 2025 at 22:10, Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6(a)cornell.edu> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> That red ink would mostly be mine. I think that it's important that I
> cause the visual chaos, because it is at least a visual indicator that I
> have sometimes suggested substantial changes in wording (albeit not of
> content...I hope).
> I don't know Google Docs at all well, but does anyone else know whether
> it's possible to visually merge suggested changes in the same way that a
> Microsoft Word document can hide changes in track changes?
>
> By the way, I've gone through the text up to just before the Case
> studies subsection of the Results. So, you should assume that I will *not
> *be revisiting any of the text before the Case studies during the current
> round of reviewing/editing.
>
> Wesley
>
>
>
> *******************
> Wesley Hochachka
> Senior Research Associate
> Cornell Lab of Ornithology
> ph. (607) 254-2484
> *******************
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Robert Guralnick <robgur(a)gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2025 13:54
> *To:* Steven J Baskauf <steve.baskauf(a)gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Yanina Sica <yanina.sica(a)gmail.com>; Humboldt Core TG <
> tdwg-humboldt(a)lists.tdwg.org>; Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6(a)cornell.edu>;
> Walter Jetz <walter.jetz(a)yale.edu>; Peter Brenton <Peter.Brenton(a)csiro.au>;
> Paula Zermoglio <pzermoglio(a)gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Humboldt Extension manuscript reloaded
>
> I'd love it if we could resolve a lot of comments and edits before the
> next read through. I personally find it hard to sort through a paper that
> has a lot of red ink on it and see the narrative structure and "flow". I
> can take some responsibility to accept changes or let Yani jump in and help
> with that as the lead author. Gonna wait before I do more here.
> -r
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM Steven J Baskauf <steve.baskauf(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have read through the manuscript and have made some somewhat cosmetic
> changes. Thanks for all of your wordsmithing, Wesley!
>
> Steve
> On 12/22/24 12:54 PM, Yanina Sica wrote:
>
> Dear Humboldties!
>
> It's been a few weeks of silence as I've been integrating all your
> contributions to the manuscript. Knowing all of you, it is not surprising
> to have received so many good and productive comments and contributions on
> this, I appreciate you finding the time for this despite your busy
> schedule. I really like working so collaboratively with you!
>
> As a token of appreciation, my Christmas present for you is an updated,
> considerably improved version of the manuscript. You can find it here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I7RRu6mj7u53-zz6c_8ZIYqLsNMA0o6VwP3fuST…>.
> Discussion and figures still need a lot of work (probably other parts as
> well), but at least we have a first complete draft of the manuscript.
>
> Special requests:
> - is anybody interested in taking a creative take on Figure 1? I would be
> happy to discuss my ideas which I was not able to communicate with current
> figure proposals
> - I would appreciate any general comment regarding the current
> structure of sections and content, in particular regarding how to handle
> the case studies. The manuscript is already quite long...
> - editorial skills are needed, please edit freely!
> - big-picture thinkers are also needed, take a stab!
>
> I was hoping to have your feedback by the last week of January, do you
> think this is doable? If yes, I will organize a meeting in the first week
> of February to discuss your feedback and start making decisions regarding
> journals.
>
> I hope you have a great start of the new year, all the best in 2025!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yani
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yani
>
>
>
> --
>
>
Thank you so much Peter! I accepted most of your editorial changes and left
some comments for everybody to see.
What about the rest of the team, *do you think you will be able to review
the draft by the end of January? *
*I propose a meeting on Wed Feb 5 at 12:00 UTC to discuss progress and
figures. *
*Please let me know if you **agree with the plan or if you **need more
time.*
Hope you all started a great 2025!!!
Best,
Yani
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 2:14 AM Brenton, Peter (NCMI, Black Mountain) <
Peter.Brenton(a)csiro.au> wrote:
> Hi Yani and team,
>
>
>
> Sorry I have been offline for a long time. I took a large block of leave
> and have been travelling. I am back now for a while and am still picking up
> threads that I left loose before I finished.
>
> I’ve added some comments and suggested edits to the draft manuscript. It
> is looking very good though, congratulation all.
>
>
>
> Anyway, have a great Christmas and new year break and see you in a few
> weeks.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> *From:* Yanina Sica <yanina.sica(a)gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, 23 December 2024 4:55 AM
> *To:* Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt(a)lists.tdwg.org>; Steven J Baskauf <
> steve.baskauf(a)gmail.com>; Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6(a)cornell.edu>; Robert
> Guralnick <robgur(a)gmail.com>; Walter Jetz <walter.jetz(a)yale.edu>;
> Brenton, Peter (NCMI, Black Mountain) <Peter.Brenton(a)csiro.au>; Paula
> Zermoglio <pzermoglio(a)gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Humboldt Extension manuscript reloaded
>
>
>
> Dear Humboldties!
>
>
>
> It's been a few weeks of silence as I've been integrating all your
> contributions to the manuscript. Knowing all of you, it is not surprising
> to have received so many good and productive comments and contributions on
> this, I appreciate you finding the time for this despite your busy
> schedule. I really like working so collaboratively with you!
>
>
>
> As a token of appreciation, my Christmas present for you is an updated,
> considerably improved version of the manuscript. You can find it here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I7RRu6mj7u53-zz6c_8ZIYqLsNMA0o6VwP3fuST…>.
> Discussion and figures still need a lot of work (probably other parts as
> well), but at least we have a first complete draft of the manuscript.
>
>
>
> Special requests:
>
> - is anybody interested in taking a creative take on Figure 1? I would be
> happy to discuss my ideas which I was not able to communicate with current
> figure proposals
>
> - I would appreciate any general comment regarding the current
> structure of sections and content, in particular regarding how to handle
> the case studies. The manuscript is already quite long...
>
> - editorial skills are needed, please edit freely!
>
> - big-picture thinkers are also needed, take a stab!
>
>
>
> I was hoping to have your feedback by the last week of January, do you
> think this is doable? If yes, I will organize a meeting in the first week
> of February to discuss your feedback and start making decisions regarding
> journals.
>
>
>
> I hope you have a great start of the new year, all the best in 2025!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Yani
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yani
>
