OK, those are easy fixes. Remove the IRI examples, maybe add another string literal example in place of each IRI removed.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bob Morris morris.bob@gmail.com wrote:
I concur with Paul's concurrence.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Paul J. Morris mole@morris.net wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:37:25 -0500 Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
Actually, let me be more blunt. I object to the adoption of these terms as currently proposed because the recommendation in the comment is not clear. I think that these three term adoption issues are blocked by the adoption of the RDF guide.
I concur. The dwc and dwcIRI namespaces provide a clear mechanism for separating the handling literals or IRIs. We shouldn't be providing contradictory guidance for using IRIs as values in the dwc namespace.
-Paul
Paul J. Morris Biodiversity Informatics Manager Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-- Robert A. Morris
Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390
Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University
email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://wiki.datakurator.net http://taxonconceptexplorer.org/ http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content