OK, those are easy fixes. Remove the IRI examples, maybe add another string literal example in place of each IRI removed.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
I concur with Paul's concurrence.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Paul J. Morris <mole@morris.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:37:25 -0500
> Steve Baskauf <steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>> Actually, let me be more blunt.  I object to the adoption of these
>> terms as currently proposed because the recommendation in the comment
>> is not clear.  I think that these three term adoption issues are
>> blocked by the adoption of the RDF guide.
>
> I concur.   The dwc and dwcIRI namespaces provide a clear mechanism for
> separating the handling literals or IRIs.  We shouldn't be providing
> contradictory guidance for using IRIs as values in the dwc namespace.
>
> -Paul
> --
> Paul J. Morris
> Biodiversity Informatics Manager
> Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
> mole@morris.net  AA3SD  PGP public key available
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content



--
Robert A. Morris

Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
UMASS-Boston
100 Morrissey Blvd
Boston, MA 02125-3390


Filtered Push Project
Harvard University Herbaria
Harvard University

email: morris.bob@gmail.com
web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org
       http://wiki.datakurator.net
       http://taxonconceptexplorer.org/
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content