I concur with Paul's concurrence.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Paul J. Morris mole@morris.net wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:37:25 -0500 Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
Actually, let me be more blunt. I object to the adoption of these terms as currently proposed because the recommendation in the comment is not clear. I think that these three term adoption issues are blocked by the adoption of the RDF guide.
I concur. The dwc and dwcIRI namespaces provide a clear mechanism for separating the handling literals or IRIs. We shouldn't be providing contradictory guidance for using IRIs as values in the dwc namespace.
-Paul
Paul J. Morris Biodiversity Informatics Manager Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content