This message is related to a DwC clarification given by John Wieczorek in http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2010-January/000219.html
in response to my post
http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2009-December/000201.html
With regards to John's email, it seems clear to me that the subject of dwc:recordedBy should be Occurrences derived directly from Individuals, i.e. those which in the examples of my previous email which have gray arrows and would have been given "documentsDistribution" values of "True".
That is a more specific way of defining the applicability of recordedBy than the word "original" in the term definition.
I agree with what John said in his post that the dcterms:creator may not be the same as dwc:collector in many circumstances, but I think in his example of a specimen preparator, I would provide the name of the institution as dcterms:creator rather than the person who was the specimen preparator. I suppose that could be a matter of preference - it's probably more important that the dwc:collector be properly recorded.
I'm not sure what I think about John's statement that the dwc:recordedBy value for Occurrence resources with ”documentsDistribution" values of true should be applied to all of the resources derived from them. The problem is that if the chain of derivation becomes too complicated, it becomes unclear what the "original" Occurrence is. What about the situation in example 3:
http://people.vanderbilt.edu/~steve.baskauf/conceptual-scheme-botanical.gif
which is a relatively realistic circumstance in a
botanical
garden? Would I give a dwc:recordedBy
value to the
Steve Baskauf
--Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A. delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235 office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu