[tdwg-content] Question about "vocabulary" in Darwin Core Archives assistant [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
pmurray at anbg.gov.au
Mon May 23 06:27:07 CEST 2011
On 30/04/2011, at 6:21 AM, Steve Baskauf wrote:
> I'm wondering is whether I can put what effectively amounts to as a
> namespace in that spot.
At a guess:
Owl supports the idea of an 'Ontology' object. Usually this is done in the rdf as that object with no fragment identifier. Thus, when you fetch
You get RDF that describes the OWL "ontology" object whose URI is
As well as RDF that describes other objects
and so on.
So ... a namespace is not necessarily the same thing as an ontology object, but it's usually done that way.
If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of information in the e-mail or attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
More information about the tdwg-content