[tdwg-tag] Institutions are People if they own a Collection
RichardsK at landcareresearch.co.nz
Tue Oct 20 00:18:20 CEST 2009
I third that.
I beleive it may help though if we nut this out in some form of workshop where we can produce a core model that "merges" LSID Vocs and DwC concepts. This model could then be applied to various representations - eg an RDF represntation that is domain indepentdent, DwC RDF version (the current one), etc depending on the "use case" in question.
From: tdwg-tag-bounces at lists.tdwg.org [tdwg-tag-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Hilmar Lapp [hlapp at duke.edu]
Sent: Monday, 19 October 2009 4:47 a.m.
To: Roger Hyam
Cc: Bob Morris; Technical Architecture Group mailing list
Subject: Re: [tdwg-tag] Institutions are People if they own a Collection
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Roger Hyam wrote:
> This is why I believe we should not make assertions in the core
> ontology about range and domain of properties.
I'd fully second that. Guiding users of the ontology in how a term is
meant to be applied should not, and does not need to infringe on the
assertions entailed by that.
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
tdwg-tag mailing list
tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
Please consider the environment before printing this email
Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
More information about the tdwg-tag