[tdwg-tag] TDWG ontology revisited ... a newcomer's perspective

Jim Croft jim.croft at gmail.com
Fri May 15 02:39:52 CEST 2009


On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Paul Kirk <p.kirk at cabi.org> wrote:
> Pete,
>
> If you had a 'container' called species concept what would you put in it so
> that computers, let alone other people, knew what you meant?

That's a no brainer... her you go:

01110101 01110010 01101110 00111010 01101100 01110011 01101001
01100100 00111010 01110101 01100010 01101001 01101111 00101110
01101111 01110010 01100111 00111010 01101110 01100001 01101101
01100101 01100010 01100001 01101110 01101011 00111010 00110010
00110101 00111001 00110011 00111001 00110100 00110111

   or to be abstract:

75 72 6e 3a 6c 73 69 64 3a 75 62 69 6f 2e 6f 72 67 3a 6e 61 6d 65 62
61 6e 6b 3a 32 35 39 33 39 34 37

yep... sure works for me...  know *exactly* what you are talking about... :)

jim

_________________
Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft



More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list