[tdwg-tapir] Is the current schema valid?

D ö ring, Markus m.doering at BGBM.org
Wed Aug 1 17:27:23 CEST 2007

Honetly I dont really understand the validation error, but it has to do with
the all group for sure:
E cos-all-limited.1.2: An 'all' model group must appear in a particle with
'{'min occurs'}' = '{'max occurs'}' = 1, and that particle must be part of a
pair which constitutes the '{'content type'}' of a complex type definition.

I therefore have replaced the all with a sequence and the schema validates
again. I also raised the schema version to 1.01 which we never did before. I
think we should really do so while remaining the namespace under



Am 31.07.2007 19:00 Uhr schrieb "Renato De Giovanni" unter
<renato at cria.org.br>:

> Hi Markus,
> Would you like to try to make the schema valid again? (I don't use
> oxygen here). Or should we just replace xsd:all by xsd:sequence?
> Thanks,
> --
> Renato
> On 31 Jul 2007 at 17:31, Döring, Markus wrote:
>> Renato,
>> Afaik oxygen is using xerces for validation - which is a very good
>> parser/validator. Not sure if the w3c xsv validator is more trustable, but I
>> feel very uncomfortable if xerces doesnt validate the schema.
>> Markus

More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list