[tdwg-tapir] Is the current schema valid?

Renato De Giovanni renato at cria.org.br
Thu Aug 2 00:47:17 CEST 2007

Hi Markus,

Thanks. I just took the liberty to move the element definitions to their
original xsd:sequence.

Now all implementations need to make sure that they advertise the
variables in the same order.

About the minor version, that's fine if we manually update them, although
I would prefer to automate the process (maybe using svn revision?).
Anyway, now it's 1.0.2, and at this point we should really not expect
frequent changes.

Best Regards,

> Renato,
> Honetly I dont really understand the validation error, but it has to do
> with
> the all group for sure:
> """
> E cos-all-limited.1.2: An 'all' model group must appear in a particle with
> '{'min occurs'}' = '{'max occurs'}' = 1, and that particle must be part of
> a
> pair which constitutes the '{'content type'}' of a complex type
> definition.
> """
> I therefore have replaced the all with a sequence and the schema validates
> again. I also raised the schema version to 1.01 which we never did before.
> I
> think we should really do so while remaining the namespace under
> http://rs.tdwg.org/tapir/1.0
> cheers
> Markus

More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list