[tdwg-tapir] CNS

Renato De Giovanni renato at cria.org.br
Fri Mar 3 02:38:13 CET 2006

Hi again,

I agree it's more general to have an unlimited number of concept name 
servers (multiple <server> elements with attributes "location" and 

The only issue is that in theory TAPIR is in a "feature freeze" 
status (http://ww3.bgbm.org/protocolwiki/RoadMap) so I think we all 
need to be careful about possible impacts on other developments. 

To my knowlegde only PyWrapper and DiGIR2 are involved with TAPIR 
(any others?). In that case, I wonder how much DiGIR2 is relying on 
the TAPIR feature freeze status at this moment? 


On 28 Feb 2006 at 11:41, "Döring, Markus" wrote:

> hi,
> is there any particular reason why we are having a primary and secondary concept nameserver only?
> Cant we allow an unlimited number of servers in an ordered list? 
> the 1st CNS server entry with highest priority in case we encounter any conflicts.
> markus

More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list