[tdwg-tapir] Schema modification: r513 - trunk/protocol

[Renato De Giovanni]

Hello Javier,

I do agree with 2 and 3. And I agree with accepting multiple concept 
nameservers, but why should we force every TAPIR service to 
understand a concept nameserver? In principle I would leave this 
optional, unless I'm missing something...

Regards,
--
Renato

On 13 Mar 2006 at 12:19, Javier de la Torre wrote:

> I hope no one disagree with:
> 
> 3) partial element from search request integrated into
> searchTemplateType. So partial is now part of a searhc template as
> well as a search request.
> 
> Javi.
> 
> On 3/13/06, tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org <tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org> wrote:
> > Author: markus
> > Date: 2006-03-13 12:04:20 +0100 (Mon, 13 Mar 2006)
> > New Revision: 513
> >
> > Modified:
> >    trunk/protocol/tapir.xsd
> > Log:
> > incorporates 3 changes:
> > 1) Allow any number of concept name servers, but require 1 (capabilities)
> > 2) simpleXpathType is a string now
> > 3) partial element from search request integrated into searchTemplateType. So partial is now part of a searhc template as well as a search request.