IndexFungorum LSID Wiki

Thu Feb 23 08:46:20 CET 2006

I have briefly updated the Wiki for the IndexFungorum LSID prototype at

http://wiki.gbif.org/guidwiki/wikka.php?wakka=LSIDResolverForTaxonNamesIF

As I was filling in the specs, it made me think it would be good to
have a "suggested" list of LSID namespaces that different LSID
authorities could use if suitable.  At present the IndexFungorum
namespace is "Names" - which may not be ideal.  This will differ however
for central LSID authorities and distributed authorities.  Eg if a
central authority "guid.org" is setup the namespace
"indexfungorum/names" may be suitable for taxon name objects [a link to
a glossary would be helpful here to explain what I mean by a name
object], but for the distributed authority "indexfungorum.org" then just
"names" may do the job.

Another alternative is to put the "distributed" authority in the
authority name, eg "indexfungorum.guid.org" leaving it up to DNS to
locate the authority, then leave the namespace simple, in this example
"names", eg "urn:lsid:indexfungorum.guid.org:names:123456".

Any thoughts?

Kevin

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WARNING: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or
privileged. They are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read,
used, copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error.  If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and
delete this message and any attachments.

The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and do not
necessarily reflect the official views of Landcare Research.

Landcare Research
http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

--=__PartF4D6469C.0__=
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: HTML

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1522" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV>I have briefly updated the Wiki for the IndexFungorum LSID prototype =
at </DIV>
<DIV><A href=3D"http://wiki.gbif.org/guidwiki/wikka.php?wakka=3DLSIDResolve=
rForTaxonNamesIF">http://wiki.gbif.org/guidwiki/wikka.php?wakka=3DLSIDResol=
verForTaxonNamesIF</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>As I was filling in the specs, it made me think it would be good to =
have a "suggested" list of LSID namespaces that different LSID authorities =
could use if suitable.&nbsp; At present the IndexFungorum namespace is =
"Names" - which may not be ideal.&nbsp; This will differ however for&nbsp;c=
entral LSID authorities and distributed authorities.&nbsp; Eg if a central =
authority "guid.org" is setup the namespace "indexfungorum/names" may be =
suitable for taxon name objects [a link to a glossary would be helpful =
here to explain what I mean by a name object], but for the distributed =
authority "indexfungorum.org" then just "names" may do the job.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Another alternative is to put the "distributed" authority in the =
authority name, eg "indexfungorum.guid.org" leaving it up to DNS to locate =
the authority, then leave the namespace simple,&nbsp;in this example&nbsp;"=
names", eg "urn:lsid:indexfungorum.guid.org:names:123456".</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Any thoughts?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Kevin</DIV></BODY></HTML>

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR>
WARNING: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or<BR>
privileged. They are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read,<BR>
used, copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error.  If you are<BR>
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and<BR>
delete this message and any attachments.<BR>
<BR>
The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and do not<BR>
necessarily reflect the official views of Landcare Research.  <BR>
<BR>
Landcare Research<BR>
http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz<BR>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR>
<BR>
</BODY></HTML>