AW: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology

["Döring, Markus"]

that sounds best to me so far.
yes, any other suggestion?


-- Markus
  

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org 
> [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von 
> Renato De Giovanni
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38
> An: tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
> 
> Markus,
> 
> How about defining a controlled vocabulary?
> <operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]">
> --
> Renato
> 
> On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:
> 
> > hi,
> > I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the 
> capabilities that tells others if this provider wants to 
> receive log-only requests. How should we call it?
> > 
> > <operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations 
> > logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true"> 
> <operations 
> > logRequestsAccepted="true">
> > 
> > >From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired".
> > Any preferences or different suggestions?
> > 
> > regards
> > -- Markus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
>