[tdwg-tapir] Concept mappings

Javier de la Torre jatorre at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 14:00:33 CEST 2006

Yes, we tried and it works.

Thats the reason why we had to adapt for multiple namespaces some time ago.

But you can not specify the typical GML app schema, I had to do the
same as with RDF, you have to create a fake schema that simulates it.
But we learnt some time ago that this legal :)

Also consider that being able to produce a valid GML app schema as
output doesnt mean TAPIR has WFS support!

But is a good begining :)


On 8/3/06, Roger Hyam <roger at tdwg.org> wrote:
> Hi Tapir Guys,
> One quick question: Will TAPIR be able to produce valid GML as an output
> model. i.e. if I specify a simple GML application schema as a output
> model should it work? Has anyone done this?
> I presume that if it works as an output model I can also use it as a
> conceptual schema and just ask for the default mappings.
> Thanks,
> Roger
> --
> -------------------------------------
>  Roger Hyam
>  Technical Architect
>  Taxonomic Databases Working Group
> -------------------------------------
>  http://www.tdwg.org
>  roger at tdwg.org
>  +44 1578 722782
> -------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir

More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list