[tdwg-tapir] {Definitely Spam?} Modification inthe Inventoryresponse
Javier de la Torre
jatorre at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 09:24:32 CEST 2005
Hi all,
I don't know which name I prefer. I like label because is very
natural, but makes the protocol not so technical :D What about tagName?
No, seriously, I like label.
Regarding the default value, I already included in the schema that I
sent "value" as the default value (uf!).
Javi.
On Oct 25, 2005, at 5:56 PM, Döring, Markus wrote:
> ...and what about naming the attribute just "label" ?
> More humanlike, isn't it?
>
> <concept path='dwc:/Country' label='Country' />
> <concept path='dwc:/Country' tag='Country' />
> <concept path='dwc:/Country' elementName='Country' />
>
> Markus
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-
> bounces at lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von Roger Hyam
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 15:24
> An: Döring, Markus
> Cc: tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] {Definitely Spam?} Modification inthe
> Inventoryresponse
>
> Seems OK to me as well
>
> Döring, Markus wrote:
>
>
>> I like the idea.
>> It will make the inventory a little bit more "customizable"
>> similar to the searches.
>> Are there any objections or other preferred names for the new
>> attribute?
>>
>> Could be for example elementName, responseElement, responseName,
>> tag, tagname, name, renamed. I think I quite like tag.
>>
>> And I think it should be optional and default to the <value> tag
>> if not supplied.
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org
>> [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von Javier
>> privat
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 12:41
>> An: tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
>> Betreff: [tdwg-tapir] {Definitely Spam?} Modification in the
>> Inventoryresponse
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Samy Gaiji, from IPGRI, sent us yesterday an email with comments
>> about TAPIR. He consider the response format of the inventory
>> operation inconvenient. For those not remembering an inventory
>> operation looks like this:
>>
>> Request:
>> ------------
>> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
>> <request>
>> <header />
>> <inventory count='true' start='0' limit='50'
>> xmlns:dwc='http://digir.net/schema/conceptual/darwin/2003/1.0'>
>> <concepts>
>> <concept path='dwc:/Country' />
>> <concept path='dwc:/Genus' />
>> </concepts>
>> </inventory>
>> </request>
>> ----
>> Response
>> -------------
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <response>
>> <header></header>
>> <inventory>
>> <record>
>> <value>AUSTRALIA</value>
>> <value>Calicium</Genus>
>> </record>
>> <summary start="0" totalReturned="50" totalMatched="73"
>> next="50" />
>> </inventory>
>> </response>
>> --------------
>>
>> He find hards to parse after that all concepts are named 'value'
>> and having to trust on that the elements are returned in the same
>> order as they were request. I don't know, for me this does not
>> look like a big issue, but in any case here is a proposal that
>> makes possible to assign names to the elements that are responded.
>>
>> Request:
>> -----------------------------------
>> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
>> <request>
>> <header />
>> <inventory count='true' start='0' limit='50'
>> xmlns:dwc='http://digir.net/schema/conceptual/darwin/2003/1.0'>
>> <concepts>
>> <concept path='dwc:/Country' elementName='Country' />
>> <concept path='dwc:/Genus' elementName='Genus' />
>> </concepts>
>> </inventory>
>> </request>
>> -------------------------------
>> Response:
>> -------------------------------
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <response>
>> <header></header>
>> <inventory>
>> <record>
>> <Country>AUSTRALIA</Country>
>> <Genus>Calicium</Genus>
>> </record>
>> <summary start="0" totalReturned="50" totalMatched="73"
>> next="50" />
>> </inventory>
>> </response>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> You can find attached a modification of the latest protocol schema
>> that includes this.
>>
>> What are your thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-tapir mailing list
>> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir_lists.tdwg.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------
> Roger Hyam
> Technical Architect
> Taxonomic Databases Working Group
> -------------------------------------
> http://www.tdwg.org
> roger at tdwg.org
> +44 1578 722782
> -------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir_lists.tdwg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir_lists.tdwg.org
>
More information about the tdwg-tag
mailing list