AW: Topic 3: GUIDs for Taxon Names and Taxon Concepts
Yde de Jong
yjong at SCIENCE.UVA.NL
Fri Nov 4 15:31:19 CET 2005
Dear Robert,
What I mean is that most entomologists will
summarize a taxonomic treatment like:
Eupogodon spinellus (C.Agardh 1827)
† Dasya spinella C.Agardh 1827
= Dasyopsis spinella (C.Agardh 1827)
= Dasya cervicornis J.Agardh 1841
= Dasyopsis cervicornis (J.Agardh 1841)
= Eupogodon cervicornis (J.Agardh 1841)
= Gigartina flabellata Schousboe 1892
= Larnacea flabellata (Schousboe 1892)
= Eupogodon flabellatus (Schousboe 1892)
‰ Dasya acanthophora Montagne 1840
‰ Rodonema spinella Naccari 1828
‰ Eupogonium spinellum Kützing 1879
--------
....in either this way:
Eupogodon Kützing 1845
= Dasyopsis Zanardini 1843
Eupogodon spinellus (C.Agardh 1827) - originally in Dasya
= cervicornis J.Agardh 1841 - originally in Dasya
= flabellata Schousboe 1892 - originally in Gigartina
....or this way:
Eupogodon Kützing
= Dasyopsis Zanardini
Eupogodon spinellus (C.Agardh)
† Dasya spinella C.Agardh
= Dasya cervicornis J.Agardh 1841
= Gigartina flabellata Schousboe 1892
And when some generic names are frequently
associated with certain species-group names
within a genus also:
Eupogodon Kützing
= Dasyopsis Zanardini
= Gigartina auct.
= Larnacea auct.
Eupogodon spinellus (C.Agardh)
† Dasya spinella C.Agardh
= Dasya cervicornis J.Agardh 1841
= Gigartina flabellata Schousboe 1892
Kind regards,
Yde
>Dear Yde,
>
>>I have to check if the TCS can deal with
>>objective synonymy in a zoological sense.
>>Species2000 for instance can't not deal either
>>with objective synonymy nor with basionyms and
>>is therefore missing a crucial part of
>>information.
>
>Just asking: What exactly do you mean with 'objectice sysnonymy in
>zoological sense' ?
>
>regards,
>Robert Huber
--======_-1081007816=_ma======
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: AW: Topic 3: GUIDs for Taxon Names and Taxon
Concepts</title></head><body>
<div><font color="#000000">Dear Robert,</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">What I mean is that most entomologists will
summarize a taxonomic treatment like:</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i><br></i></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon spinellus</i> (C.Agardh
1827)</font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">†<i> Dasya spinella</i> C.Agardh
1827</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Dasyopsis spinella</i> (C.Agardh
1827)<br>
=<i> Dasya cervicornis</i> J.Agardh 1841<br>
=<i> Dasyopsis cervicornis</i> (J.Agardh 1841)<br>
=<i> Eupogodon cervicornis</i> (J.Agardh 1841)</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Gigartina flabellata</i> Schousboe
1892</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Larnacea flabellata</i> (Schousboe
1892)<br>
=<i> Eupogodon flabellatus</i> (Schousboe 1892)</font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">‰<i> Dasya acanthophora</i> Montagne
1840</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">‰<i> Rodonema spinella</i> Naccari
1828<br>
‰<i> Eupogonium spinellum</i> Kützing 1879</font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">--------</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">....in either this way:</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon</i> Kützing 1845<br>
=<i> Dasyopsis</i> Zanardini 1843</font><br>
<font color="#000000"><i></i></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon spinellus</i> (C.Agardh 1827)
- originally in<i> Dasya</i></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> cervicornis</i> J.Agardh 1841 -
originally in<i> Dasya</i><br>
=<i> flabellata</i> Schousboe 1892 - originally in<i>
Gigartina</i></font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">....or this way:</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon</i> Kützing<br>
=<i> Dasyopsis</i> Zanardini</font><br>
<font color="#000000"><i></i></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon spinellus</i>
(C.Agardh)</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">†<i> Dasya spinella</i>
C.Agardh</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Dasya cervicornis</i> J.Agardh
1841</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Gigartina flabellata</i> Schousboe
1892</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>And when some generic names are frequently associated with
certain species-group names within a genus also:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon</i> Kützing</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Dasyopsis</i> Zanardini</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Gigartina</i> auct.</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Larnacea</i> auct.</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><i>Eupogodon spinellus</i>
(C.Agardh)</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">†<i> Dasya spinella</i>
C.Agardh</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Dasya cervicornis</i> J.Agardh
1841</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">=<i> Gigartina flabellata</i> Schousboe
1892</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Kind regards,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Yde</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<hr>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Dear Yde,</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I have to check if the TCS can deal with
objective synonymy in a zoological sense. Species2000 for instance
can't not deal either with objective synonymy nor with basionyms and
is therefore missing a crucial part of information.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Just asking: What exactly do you mean
with 'objectice sysnonymy in<br>
zoological sense' ?<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
Robert Huber</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>
More information about the tdwg-tag
mailing list