S.Hinchcliffe at KEW.ORG
Thu Nov 17 09:46:21 CET 2005
I think the issuing authority will tend to give a clue as to what the
GUID refers to. However we do need to be careful that we don't rely
on that being the case in any systems that we develop around them to
retain opacity - otherwise we are building a layer of implicit
business rules into LSIDs that they weren't designed to support and
which could make the systems that rely on them more fragile than they
need to be.
> Rich and all,
> I think Roger raised an interesting issue: GUID opacity.
> Reading between the lines of the previous discussions regarding the many
> types of GUIDs we should have, I suspect that some of us are assuming
> that GUIDs should not be completely opaque.
> For example, when you say we should have a NameUsage GUID, for example,
> would you hardcode that in the namespace of an LSID, like the following one?
> LSIDs and other GUID technologies require that their ids must be opaque.
> However, due to the syntax of LSIDs, users might tend to circumvent that
> requirement and use parts of the LSID (the namespace) for other purposes.
> In my opinion, breaking opacity might offer simple implementation path
> to hardcode some semantics directly into the GUIDs without requiring any
> other service layer. However, that might not be very extensible in the
> sense that it doesnt allow for new classifications of GUIDs that have
> been already issued.
> I think some of the specimen folks also tend to use this shortcut when
> they offer to use same GUIDs for the same physical object. What is
> attempted in that case is to hardcode known relationships between
> specimens and to simplify identification of duplicates. But again, that
> could be done in a more extensible manner via a shared ontology and
> separate metadata services.
> Again, if decide to use the shared ontology idea (which we havent
> discussed enough, but we should), we can keep our system flexible and
> extensible, and we can leave our GUIDs semantically opaque.
> What are your thoughts on that matter?
> Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis.
> Instale o discador agora!
*** Sally Hinchcliffe
*** Computer section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
*** tel: +44 (0)20 8332 5708
*** S.Hinchcliffe at rbgkew.org.uk
More information about the tdwg-tag