[tdwg-humboldt] ALA data team feedback

[John Wieczorek]

Dear all,

In our meeting today we discussed that the time requirement for the public
comment to Humboldt has now been met without any outstanding issues, but we
did not have any time to review the document shared here. Independent of
that document we agreed that we would keep the public review open at least
until Ani has had a chance to corral her iDiv audience and discuss the
extension live and in person.

We also discussed the remaining promised Task Group task of mapping
additional data sets to get to the total of seven. As that was a proposed
output of the Task Group, it doesn't affect the term ratification process,
and is open to justification to the Executive committee if not all seven
are actually delivered. If we can though, great, and the timeline for doing
so only really affects the disbanding of the Task Group. Since we will wait
at least two weeks for the iDiv feedback and we need to assess this
document from Peggy and add issues to the issue tracker as appropriate, we
are likely looking at at least another 30 days of public comments from the
time that is done anyway.

So the big task for next week is to discuss the ALA report, and even before
then, if possible, get any clear issue into the Humboldt Extension issue
tracker (https://github.com/tdwg/hc/issues).

Cheers,

John

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:55 AM ys628 <yanina.sica at yale.edu> wrote:

> Dear Peggy,
>
> Thank you so much for the detailed revision and for sharing your feedback
> with us.
> This is very useful for us particularly because the issues you found are
> clearly described and justified, I really appreciate this.
>
> We have a meeting today (which unfortunately I cannot assist) but I would
> ask the group to start revising your feedback.
> I uploaded the document
> <https://docs.google.com/file/d/1OxJ_H5vBd9pucjdgQDa6qMaQKl4O89gf/edit?usp=docslist_api&filetype=msword>
> to our shared Drive so we can start adding our comments in response to your
> findings.
>
> After internally discussing your feedback, I will reach out to you and
> invite you to join our meetings so we can find a solution.
>
> Thank you again and I am glad you find the Humbold a useful addition!
>
> Best,
>
> Yanina Sica
>
>
>
>
> Yanina V. Sica, PhD
> Lead Data Team
> Map of Life <https://mol.org/> | Center for Biodiversity and Global Change
> <https://bgc.yale.edu/>
> Yale University
> pronouns: she/her/hers
> If you are receiving this email outside of your working hours, I am not
> expecting you to read or respond
> ------------------------------
> *From:* tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces at lists.tdwg.org> on behalf of
> Newman, Peggy (NCMI, Clayton) <Peggy.Newman at csiro.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2023 6:42:28 AM
> *To:* tdwg-humboldt at lists.tdwg.org <tdwg-humboldt at lists.tdwg.org>
> *Subject:* [tdwg-humboldt] ALA data team feedback
>
>
> Greetings Team Humboldt!
>
>
>
> It was sure nice to catch up with some of you over the past weeks.
>
>
>
> I have a document that we’ve put together with our suggestions for the
> extension. Our team had two discussions about it, and Doug wrote up our
> conclusions in a 2 pager word doc.
>
>
>
> So I’ve tried to attach them here, but don’t know how the listserv will
> cope with a document.  Let’s see.
>
>
>
> In any case, how is best to proceed from here? Let us know if you’d like
> to talk in person I guess.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Peggy
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-humboldt mailing list
> tdwg-humboldt at lists.tdwg.org
> https://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-humboldt/attachments/20231018/a22e4c67/attachment.html>