[tdwg-humboldt] Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?

John Wieczorek tuco at berkeley.edu
Mon May 23 02:04:22 UTC 2022


To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect
to identifications."

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan at naturalsciences.be>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
>
> The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl
> and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species
> with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
>
> If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension,
> does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as
> those absence records in occurrence extension?
>
> Thank you so much for your help!!
>
>
> Cheers
> Ming
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-humboldt mailing list
> tdwg-humboldt at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-humboldt/attachments/20220522/56437469/attachment.html>


More information about the tdwg-humboldt mailing list