[tdwg-humboldt] Humboldt Task Group Meeting Wed 31 March 2021, 0800 EST: homework!

[Paula Zermoglio]

Thanks Yani!

This week I'm running a workshop on data mobilization for Haiti, and I had
not noticed that given the recent time saving change (which Haiti follows),
the workshop will start an hour earlier than I expected. Unfortunately,
this means I won't be able to attend our meeting :(

I will, however, work on the compilation of definitions from everyone and
can have the corresponding slides ready for everyone else to discuss. I've
put the ppt file we were using in previous meetings in the HC drive folder,
and have already added the site-related terms (in case you get to discuss
them on Wed).

Best,
paula

El dom., 28 de mar. de 2021 16:46, Yanina Sica <yanina.sica at yale.edu>
escribió:

> Hi all,
>
>
> As per our discussion at the last meeting, we have homework for next
> Wednesday!
>
>
> Propose a definition (include comments and examples if appropriate) for
> the following HC terms:
>
>    -
>
>    protocolName
>    -
>
>       The idea of this term would be to capture a -more or less- specific
>       protocol, but without including specific details in textual form. As
>       discussed in our last meeting this term could involve the concatenation of
>       General Target Category + Method Approach + General Method Type + Specific
>       Method Name from Survey Methods Definition
>       <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ojS1gRk5MJZ5OWYuaXaGt0oFn3J-JPvpHT-0JkUNwZA/edit#gid=0>
>       (better known as “Peter’s spreadsheet” :) ). Consider if such a term would
>       need an associated controlled vocabulary, and if so, whether we would
>       attempt to provide one, point to existing one(s), or leave open for future
>       work.
>       -
>
>    protocolDescription/protocolDetail
>    -
>
>       As discussed in our last meeting, this term would allow users to
>       capture detailed information about the protocol, including any deviation
>       from the published methodologies  and unpublished protocols.
>       -
>
>    protocolReference
>    -
>
>       From our conversation in our last meeting, it was not clear if this
>       should be retained separately or included in
>       protocolDescription/protocolDetail. If you feel it should be a separate
>       term, please provide definition, comments, examples. This term would refer
>       to formatted references and URL or direct DOI links to the protocols used.
>
>
> For reference:
>
>    -
>
>    check the definitions of the original related terms in HC (see Vocabulary
>    file <https://github.com/tdwg/hc/tree/main/vocabulary>: protocol name,
>    protocol detail, protocol citation, protocol reference)
>    -
>
>    revisit the definition of dwc:samplingProtocol
>    <https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:samplingProtocol>
>
>
> *Please send your proposed definitions to me or Paula by Tuesday* so we
> include them in a small presentation to improve our discussions.
>
> Thank you and see you on Wed!
>
>
> LIST OF TERMS TO BE DISCUSSED NEXT WED:
> original_HC_label
> protocol name
> protocol detail
> protocol citation
> protocol reference
> effort amount upper bound
> effort upper bound unit
> effort amount lower bound
> effort lower bound unit
> If time allows we can start discussing site description terms:
>    number of separate sites
>    site nesting
>    site names
>    site details
>
>
> Yanina V. Sica, PhD
> Data Manager | Map of Life
> Yale University
> pronouns: she/her/hers
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-humboldt mailing list
> tdwg-humboldt at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-humboldt/attachments/20210328/835487c8/attachment-0001.html>