[tdwg-content] Darwin Core Proposal - term content recommendations to comments

[John Wieczorek]

Does anyone have similar concerns about iao:example?

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Paul J. Morris <mole at morris.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:17:58 -0500
> Bob Morris <morris.bob at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But  skos:note and its subproperties (including skos:example) can take
> > literals or references [1].  To me, that weighs   more than the
> > baggage of minting two new terms.
>
> Also, SKOS, unless care is taken to import the Owl-DL version, brings
> you into Owl-Full, with undesirable consequences for those who wish to
> do reasoning.  In early versions of dwcFP, we did include SKOS terms,
> but removed them because of the consequences for reasoning.
>
> SKOS has some nice terms, reuse is a nice idea, but it comes with
> significant knowledge engineering consequences.
>
> -Paul
> --
> Paul J. Morris
> Biodiversity Informatics Manager
> Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
> mole at morris.net  AA3SD  PGP public key available
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20150205/e90e648b/attachment.html