[tdwg-content] Darwin Core Proposal - term content recommendations to comments
tuco at berkeley.edu
Thu Feb 5 18:21:33 CET 2015
Does anyone have similar concerns about iao:example?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Paul J. Morris <mole at morris.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:17:58 -0500
> Bob Morris <morris.bob at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But skos:note and its subproperties (including skos:example) can take
> > literals or references . To me, that weighs more than the
> > baggage of minting two new terms.
> Also, SKOS, unless care is taken to import the Owl-DL version, brings
> you into Owl-Full, with undesirable consequences for those who wish to
> do reasoning. In early versions of dwcFP, we did include SKOS terms,
> but removed them because of the consequences for reasoning.
> SKOS has some nice terms, reuse is a nice idea, but it comes with
> significant knowledge engineering consequences.
> Paul J. Morris
> Biodiversity Informatics Manager
> Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
> mole at morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tdwg-content