[tdwg-content] Darwin Core vs. Simple Darwin Core

[John Wieczorek]

Though http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/xsd/tdwg_dwc_class_terms.xsd allows it
(it is agnostic about how one chooses to define the hierarchy of
classes), I agree that the Identification should refer to the Taxon
rather than the other way around.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Markus Döring <m.doering at mac.com> wrote:
>> By the way, I find something else really puzzling about this example from the XML Guide.  Why, oh why, does the Taxon object link back to the Identification object rather than the other way around????  This seems to me seriously to compromise the idea that we can reuse a DwC Taxon class in a semantically consistent fashion across collection data and species checklists.
>
> Donald, thanks for spotting this.
> It really doesnt make any sense. The identification should definitely point to the taxon via dwc:taxonID.
> Shall we add it as an issue to be fixed in the site?
>
> Markus
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Donald
>>
>>
>>
>> Donald Hobern, Director, Atlas of Living Australia
>> CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601
>> Phone: (02) 62464352 Mobile: 0437990208
>> Email: Donald.Hobern at csiro.au
>> Web: http://www.ala.org.au/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of joel sachs
>> Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2011 1:48 AM
>> To: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
>> Subject: [tdwg-content] Darwin Core vs. Simple Darwin Core
>>
>>
>> Darwin Core is one of my favourite things. It's simple, elegant, and flexible. I wasn't there at design time, so I don't know if it was designed with the semantic web in mind, but it looks like it. It is, as John put it, primarily a collection of terms [and their definitions]. So if two people/agents use the same terms, they will share the same semantics. (This is why I think that a "more semantic Darwin Core" is not the appropriate goal for a Darwin Core/rdf working group.)
>>
>> I'm concerned that there's so much confusion concerning DwC, since confusion is (typically) a barrier to adoption.
>>
>> One source of confusion is Simple Darwin Core. A huge fraction of DwC records can be expressed as spreadsheets. Since *all* Simple DwC records can be expressed as spreadsheets, many people think
>>
>> Simple Darwin Core = spreadsheet-expressible Darwin Core
>>
>> (which isn't true). This means that if they want to express their data as a spreadsheet, they think they need to conform to Simple Darwin Core.
>>
>> The requirement of Simple Darwin Core is that there be no repeated elements. But the requirement for spreadsheet-expressible Darwin Core is that there be no repeated nested elements. I previously argued
>> (http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2011-January/002220.html) in favour of using subscripts to represent elements in repeated nests (thereby permitting their use in spreadsheets). Even if we don't permit that, I'm not sure that the benefits of maintaing a separate Simple Darwin Core standard, in addition to the regular Darwin Core standard, are greater than the costs in terms of giving people wrong ideas. (I prefer the presentation at http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/guides/xml/index.htm,
>> where Simple DwC is presented as simply one of several XML schemas for Darwin Core.)
>>
>> I *think* I see the motivation for Simple DwC. Suppose X wants to use Darwin Core, but doesn't know much about databases, and just wants to put all his data in a spreadsheet. He might not know what a repeated, nested data structure is. So it's easiest to just say to him "don't repeat any elements, and you'll be fine - your records will be spreadsheet-expressible". I agree that that's a benefit. Are there others?
>>
>> Thanks -
>> Joel.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-content mailing list
>> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-content mailing list
>> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>