[tdwg-content] New terms need resolution: "Individual"
Chuck.Miller at mobot.org
Thu Jul 14 19:32:07 CEST 2011
"a (meta-) population is a LifeInstance" does seem to make sense to me.
"a (meta-) population is a taxon" does not make sense to me. Nor does
"a (meta-) population is an Organism"
But "a (meta-) population is a TaxonInstance" sort of makes sense, but
Rich dislikes the inherent ambiguity that occurs when using the string
"taxon" or "taxa" in a case like this because it opens the can of worms
about names and concepts and spins off into endless related, but
disassociated, debates. The word "taxon" has several meanings that can
only be understood by a clear context within which the word is used or
by an accompanying long definition that spells out which meaning is
being used. Rich has written on this multiple times.
From: tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org
[mailto:tdwg-content-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Gregor
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:18 PM
To: Nico Cellinese
Cc: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] New terms need resolution: "Individual"
((who would not forgive you?))
but you think "Organism" includes "population" and metapopulation? We
are defining is-a relationships here (subclassing was already
discussed), so "a (meta-) population is an organism" should make sense.
It does not to me.
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
More information about the tdwg-content