[tdwg-content] Can all DwC be Simple DwC?
jsachs at csee.umbc.edu
Thu Jan 6 20:24:01 CET 2011
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
>> Couldn't this be addressed using subscripts? E.g.
>> MeasurementID_1="tail length"
>> MeasurementID_2="brain volume"
>> MeasurementUnit_2="cubic cm"
> I have no problems with pragmatism, but why are the characters not RDF
> concepts itself? I believe they should be rdf vocabularies for those
> who want to reason on them.
First, please let me correct myself. Everywhere I wrote "MeasurementID", I
should have written "measurementType". To your point ...
Recommended best practice for DwC:measurementType is to use a controlled
vocabulary. The controlled vocabulary can be an ontology. I was using
literals only for simplicity of illustration. (We should probably start
collecting controlled vocabularies/ontologies to point to from the
> One more problem: the states can be polymorphic, as in
>> MeasurementID_1="flower color"
Yes, although I don't see it as a problem. I'm not sure why the following
restriction (from the Simple Darwin Core reference) is necessary: "Every
field in the Simple Darwin Core may appear either once or not at all in a
single record." For example, we considered the bioblitz records to be
simple Darwin Core, even though there were multiple taxonConceptID columns
(for the same scientificName).
More information about the tdwg-content