[tdwg-content] GUIDs for publications (usages and names) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Peter DeVries pete.devries at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 04:03:39 CET 2011


Hi Paul,

Yes, this works for recent publications but not for the older taxonomic
publications that the BHL covers.

Also, for recent articles that are part of PubMed their are Linked Data
URI's.

Zoobank has something that almost works but the are based on LSID's.

- Pete

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Paul Murray <pmurray at anbg.gov.au> wrote:

> On 05/01/2011, at 8:01 AM, Peter DeVries wrote:
>
> Users do not want to curate their own bibliographic databases and related
> RDF, they want to simply link to a globally unique, resolvable identifier
> for that citation.
>
>
> Absolutely. There *is* a globally unique, resolvable identifier for
> publications: Digital Object Identifiers (DOI). It's a distributed,
> hierarchical system: organisations that publish works are assigned a root
> DOI and run a DOI server. Furthermore, DOIs can be assigned not simply to a
> publication, but to individual items in it, drilling down as far as you
> like.
>
> My impression is that DOIs mainly apply to things like journal articles:
> things that are being published today by publishers with an online
> presence. Many of our references here are CSIRO publications - I wonder if
> CSIRO publishing hosts a DOI resolver?
>
> A problem is that while given a DOI you can easily get the metadata for it,
> discovering the DOI for a publication is ... an effort. I imagine that
> another problem is homonyms: if two different publishers are producing
> editions of System Naturae,  there will be different DOIs for it.
>
> Another issue is that if you want to cite a page of a journal, or better -
> a particular figure in the journal, and the publisher does not publish a DOI
> for that particular thing ... where do you go from there? You could host
> your own DOI server and assign your own DOIs .... but that rather defeats
> the purpose. There's no getting away from having a "microreference" field,
> allowing a human to fill in the gaps in the identifiers with free text.
>
> See:
> http://www.doi.org/
>
> __________
>
> The list of formally registered URN namespaces is here:
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
>
> The ones potentially of interest - as far as I can see - with respect to
> serving as a globally unique citations are
>
> ISSN http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3044.txt urn:ISSN:1560-1560
> Identifies serials – periodicals, journals, newspapers
>
> ISBN http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3187.txt URN:ISBN:0-395-36341-1
> International Standard Book Number
>
> NBN http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3188.txt URN:NBN:fi-fe19981001
> National Bibliography Number. Identifiers given by the national libraries
> of various countries (Finland, in this case).
>
> These probably only go down to the "volume" level, but that's usually all
> you need for books.
>
> There are also urn namespaces for things like articles published by news
> organisations, audiovisual files, if you want to cite them.
>
> See:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number
>
> __________
>
> Finally - identifying published documents and the places in them is a
> problem that librarians, in particular, are interested in. I'm sure that the
> worldwide library science community has some kind of handle on this, and it
> might be worthwhile to leverage their solutions. They seem to have a thing
> called an OCLC number (Online Computer Library Centre). eg: 17200046. I'm
> not sure how many scientific/taxonomic libraries feed data into the worldcat
> system.
>
> See:
> http://www.oclc.org
> http://www.oclc.org/research/
> http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/web/
> http://www.worldcat.org
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> If you have received this transmission in error please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any
> attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute
> waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of
> information in the e-mail or attachments. Please consider the environment
> before printing this email.
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pete DeVries
Department of Entomology
University of Wisconsin - Madison
445 Russell Laboratories
1630 Linden Drive
Madison, WI 53706
TaxonConcept Knowledge Base <http://www.taxonconcept.org/> / GeoSpecies
Knowledge Base <http://lod.geospecies.org/>
About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base <http://about.geospecies.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20110104/cdd23d24/attachment.html 


More information about the tdwg-content mailing list