[tdwg-content] What RDF is (Was Re: Idea for Discussion, Differentiating between "type's" of identifiers)
m.doering at mac.com
Thu Oct 7 10:00:05 CEST 2010
Im looking into the archiving issue right now.
As Stan pointed out both lists still exist as you can see here:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 22:04, Blum, Stan wrote:
> TDWG-TAG was not to be decommissioned.
> If this discussion on TDWG-Content is not being archived (as Alrin noticed), then there was a glitch in the reconfiguration. I think (hope) Markus can look into that tomorrow.
> Addressing Markus’ earlier question, I don’t think this is boring to people interested in TDWG-Content. It will just need to be explained and/or summarized to those not fully aware of the technical issues, particularly if we reach a consensus. A regular restatement of the choices and issues helps to keep people focused.
> On 10/6/10 11:52 AM, "Peter DeVries" <pete.devries at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the tdwg-tag list was shutdown as part of a effort to condense the tdwg lists to those that had traffic?
>> - Pete
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Markus Döring <m.doering at mac.com> wrote:
>>> I am wondering if this discussion and similar rdf, lsid topics should continue on tdwg-tag rather than tdwg-content.
>>> We might bore quite a few people...
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
More information about the tdwg-content