[tdwg-content] year of publication

[Kevin Richards]

yes, not always easy to parse those things!  although, its not always easy to parse year strings either, eg 'end of 1998'.

we could just use Dublin Core date - then it would only be a matter of usage guidelines.

Also, what was the justification for combining nomenclature and taxonomic data together into the one dwc:Taxon class?

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: gtuco.btuco at gmail.com [mailto:gtuco.btuco at gmail.com] On Behalf Of John R. WIECZOREK
Sent: Thursday, 15 October 2009 12:48 p.m.
To: Kevin Richards
Cc: tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] year of publication

There is no separate atomized term for the year of the publication. It
is assumed to be within the full citation in the namePublishedIn term
(http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#namePublishedIn).

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Richards
<RichardsK at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:
> I have just been attempting to create some example DwC data and cannot find
> terms for "year of publication" and "year on publication".
>
> Do they exist?
>
>
>
> ta
>
> Kevin
>
> ________________________________
> Please consider the environment before printing this email
> Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is
> confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use,
> disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by
> reply email and then delete the emails.
> The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New
> Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>
>

Please consider the environment before printing this email
Warning:  This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz