It's How the Data will be Used that Counts
jrc at ANBG.GOV.AU
Wed Dec 5 08:46:09 CET 2001
> These <freeform comments> are natural-language paragraphs embedded
> in otherwise fully parsable data, which is the opposite of Kevin's
> case above. And much easier to handle, I think.
That is an intersting perspecitve, and probably right... but although
coming from different directions, is there a real difference in the
final result? Both end up as mixed content of structured (and parsable
character data interspersed with free form text...
> I put interesting data in the comments for an extremely important
> reason: I know I don't have enough data to represent the probable
> diversity in the taxon (the item), and I do not want to understate
> the diversity. Better to leave the character coded as unknown,
> but record the data. At some point in the future, the data can be
> moved from the comments to where it belongs.
Absolutely... and isn't this the holy grail we are seeking in this
descriptive data standard? I am quite sure that the model we come up
with with have a structured place for this freeform and comment
stuff... to do anything less will be to admit failure...
More information about the tdwg-content