Thanks Ben. Very good points. Most of which, I hope, we intend to implement/do.
It is certainly the intention to have TAG members made up of TAG core members, other IG conveners, TG conveners, etc, etc..., so should have a good variety of people within the group. To "understand that process" is another thing, which we are trying hard to deal with, and not absolutely certain how to deal with. Probably things like standards development guidelines, best practices, how to apply standards back to a "core ontology" ...
Kevin ________________________________________ From: Richardson, Ben [Ben.Richardson@dec.wa.gov.au] Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 2:56 p.m. To: Kevin Richards Subject: RE: TAG meeting notes
Hi Kevin,
I favour the approach that we adopted a few years ago, namely publishing documents explaining how to get things done through TDWG (http://www.tdwg.org/standards/status-and-categories/). The task of building a TS, AS, BCP or DS should be run through a group formalised to do that job. TAG members could (should) be in both the TAG as well as other groups (aren't we all?) and can keep the process moving in a group by helping the group understand that process.
Cheers, Ben
-----Original Message----- From: tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Richards Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 7:32 To: Technical Architecture Group mailing list Subject: [tdwg-tag] TAG meeting notes
Hi all
I have created a google site at https://sites.google.com/site/tdwgtag/
This has one page in it so far for the meeting notes of today and Mondays meetings. Can you review and let me know if anything has been missed or needs to be changed. Let me know if you want access to edit the page and I will give you edit access.
Kevin
Please consider the environment before printing this email Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz _______________________________________________ tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the addressee only. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender, delete the email and attachments from your system and destroy any copies you may have taken of the email and its attachments. Duplication or further distribution by hardcopy, by electronic means or verbally is not permitted without permission.
Please consider the environment before printing this email Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
...and how to reduce the amount of hand-wringing we've seen this year on the list.
Cheers, Ben
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin Richards [mailto:RichardsK@landcareresearch.co.nz] Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 13:57 To: Richardson, Ben; Technical Architecture Group mailing list Subject: RE: TAG meeting notes
Thanks Ben. Very good points. Most of which, I hope, we intend to implement/do.
It is certainly the intention to have TAG members made up of TAG core members, other IG conveners, TG conveners, etc, etc..., so should have a good variety of people within the group. To "understand that process" is another thing, which we are trying hard to deal with, and not absolutely certain how to deal with. Probably things like standards development guidelines, best practices, how to apply standards back to a "core ontology" ...
Kevin ________________________________________ From: Richardson, Ben [Ben.Richardson@dec.wa.gov.au] Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 2:56 p.m. To: Kevin Richards Subject: RE: TAG meeting notes
Hi Kevin,
I favour the approach that we adopted a few years ago, namely publishing documents explaining how to get things done through TDWG (http://www.tdwg.org/standards/status-and-categories/). The task of building a TS, AS, BCP or DS should be run through a group formalised to do that job. TAG members could (should) be in both the TAG as well as other groups (aren't we all?) and can keep the process moving in a group by helping the group understand that process.
Cheers, Ben
-----Original Message----- From: tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Richards Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 7:32 To: Technical Architecture Group mailing list Subject: [tdwg-tag] TAG meeting notes
Hi all
I have created a google site at https://sites.google.com/site/tdwgtag/
This has one page in it so far for the meeting notes of today and Mondays meetings. Can you review and let me know if anything has been missed or needs to be changed. Let me know if you want access to edit the page and I will give you edit access.
Kevin
Please consider the environment before printing this email Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz _______________________________________________ tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the addressee only. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender, delete the email and attachments from your system and destroy any copies you may have taken of the email and its attachments. Duplication or further distribution by hardcopy, by electronic means or verbally is not permitted without permission.
Please consider the environment before printing this email Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the addressee only. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender, delete the email and attachments from your system and destroy any copies you may have taken of the email and its attachments. Duplication or further distribution by hardcopy, by electronic means or verbally is not permitted without permission.
participants (2)
-
Kevin Richards -
Richardson, Ben