-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org
[mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org ] Im Auftrag
von
Renato De Giovanni
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38
An: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org
Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
Markus,
How about defining a controlled vocabulary?
<operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]">
--
Renato
On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:
> hi,
> I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the
capabilities that tells others if this provider wants
to receive
log-only requests. How should we call it?
>
> <operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations
> logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true">
<operations
> logRequestsAccepted="true">
>
> >From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired".
> Any preferences or different suggestions?
>
> regards
> -- Markus
_______________________________________________
tdwg-tapir mailing list
tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
"Döring, Markus"