Tomas, there's a wiki you might find interesting: http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/ But as far as I know, this is the only mailing list alive for discussions like that... Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: bar tomas [mailto:bartomas@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 13:13 An: Holetschek, Jörg Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data Thanks for all your help. One last question: is there a mailing list for specifically discussing conceptual aspects of Darwin Core, ABCD, etc (I haven't been able to find one) or is Tapir mailing list for that purpose? Thanks T. Bar On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Holetschek, Jörg < j.holetschek@bgbm.org> wrote: Dear Thomas, the ABCD schema can handle such unbounded data - but the only TAPIR provider software that supports ABCD (pyWrapper) is not quite bug free. So you'd have to use the BioCASe protcol - which is apparently not your intention. Cheers from Berlin, Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org]Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson (GBIF) Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. November 2008 16:22 An: bar tomas Cc: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data This is correct... largely it is used for transfer of detailed single specimen records. That is not so say you could not define some schema that reuses sections of DwC or the TDWG vocabularies - you probably would have to get into custom provider software in that case (although maybe the current tools would allow for it - Renato could give advice for TAPIRLink on this). Cheers Tim
Thanks a lot for the information.
I suppose when the record is composed of multiple specimens (whose number is recorded in ObservedIndividualCount) the individual attributes of each specimen (age, sex, maturity, etc) cannot be stored.
Tomas Bar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tim Robertson < trobertson@gbif.org> wrote:
Hi T. Bar You might consider the OBIS extensions for Darwin Core since you are concerned with marine stuff.
http://iobis.org/obis/obis.xsd
SampleSize: the size of the sample from which the collection/observation was drawn. It can be a volume (e.g. for a phytoplankton sample), a linear distance (e.g. for a visual transect or net haul), a surface area (e.g. for a benthic core), etc. This field must also include the units, e.g. 200 mfor a transect, or 0.25 m^2 for a benthic grab (use ^ to denote a superscript). Note that when multiple collections/observations are reported from the same physical sample, a code identifying the sample can be placed in the Field_Number field to allow all collections/observations from a single sample to be connected.
IndividualCount is a count of specimens (e.g. not a count of species). If you want to indicate multiple species, then you would have a record for each along with the identification and the count of individuals of that species.
So in the OBIS schema you have:
ObservedIndividualCount: The number of individuals (abundance) found in a collection/record event.
Cheers,
Tim
On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:05, bar tomas wrote:
Sorry if this question is misplaced in this discussion list, but I haven't been able to find a mailing list on the conceptual aspects of Darwin Core.
I am interested to know if there are any recommendations on how to represent abundance in Darwin Core. I have seen some datasets using IndividualCount and SampleSize. For instance, for a fishing survey, would you use IndividualCount for the number of species in a catch, and SampleSize for the distance towed?
Thank you very much _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
____________________________________________________________ Tim Robertson Systems Architect Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat (GBIF) Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark http://www.gbif.org <http://www.gbif.org/> trobertson@gbif.org Phone: +45 35 32 14 87 (Office) Fax: +45 35 32 14 80 ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
As the average TDWG mailing list is not exactly overloaded with posts, how about consolidating TDWG's mailinglists into just 3? An announcement list for TDWG business (tdwg+process), a technical one (TAG,GUID+TAPIR) and just a single content one. This would probably also help to avoid duplication of efforts and to produce more consistent results across the subgroups. Just an idea. Markus http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo On Dec 1, 2008, at 13:29, Holetschek, Jörg wrote:
Tomas,
there's a wiki you might find interesting: http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/ But as far as I know, this is the only mailing list alive for discussions like that...
Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: bar tomas [mailto:bartomas@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 13:13 An: Holetschek, Jörg Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
Thanks for all your help. One last question: is there a mailing list for specifically discussing conceptual aspects of Darwin Core, ABCD, etc (I haven't been able to find one) or is Tapir mailing list for that purpose? Thanks T. Bar
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Holetschek, Jörg <j.holetschek@bgbm.org
wrote: Dear Thomas,
the ABCD schema can handle such unbounded data - but the only TAPIR provider software that supports ABCD (pyWrapper) is not quite bug free. So you'd have to use the BioCASe protcol - which is apparently not your intention.
Cheers from Berlin, Jörg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org]Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson (GBIF) Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. November 2008 16:22 An: bar tomas Cc: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
This is correct... largely it is used for transfer of detailed single specimen records.
That is not so say you could not define some schema that reuses sections of DwC or the TDWG vocabularies - you probably would have to get into custom provider software in that case (although maybe the current tools would allow for it - Renato could give advice for TAPIRLink on this).
Cheers
Tim
Thanks a lot for the information.
I suppose when the record is composed of multiple specimens (whose number is recorded in ObservedIndividualCount) the individual attributes of each specimen (age, sex, maturity, etc) cannot be stored.
Tomas Bar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tim Robertson <trobertson@gbif.org> wrote:
Hi T. Bar You might consider the OBIS extensions for Darwin Core since you are concerned with marine stuff.
http://iobis.org/obis/obis.xsd
SampleSize: the size of the sample from which the collection/observation was drawn. It can be a volume (e.g. for a phytoplankton sample), a linear distance (e.g. for a visual transect or net haul), a surface area (e.g. for a benthic core), etc. This field must also include the units, e.g. 200 mfor a transect, or 0.25 m^2 for a benthic grab (use ^ to denote a superscript). Note that when multiple collections/observations are reported from the same physical sample, a code identifying the sample can be placed in the Field_Number field to allow all collections/observations from a single sample to be connected.
IndividualCount is a count of specimens (e.g. not a count of species). If you want to indicate multiple species, then you would have a record for each along with the identification and the count of individuals of that species.
So in the OBIS schema you have:
ObservedIndividualCount: The number of individuals (abundance) found in a collection/record event.
Cheers,
Tim
On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:05, bar tomas wrote:
Sorry if this question is misplaced in this discussion list, but I haven't been able to find a mailing list on the conceptual aspects of Darwin Core.
I am interested to know if there are any recommendations on how to represent abundance in Darwin Core. I have seen some datasets using IndividualCount and SampleSize. For instance, for a fishing survey, would you use IndividualCount for the number of species in a catch, and SampleSize for the distance towed?
Thank you very much _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
____________________________________________________________ Tim Robertson Systems Architect Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat (GBIF) Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark http://www.gbif.org trobertson@gbif.org Phone: +45 35 32 14 87 (Office) Fax: +45 35 32 14 80 ____________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
+1 vote ------------ +2 (total) On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:59, Markus Döring (GBIF) wrote:
As the average TDWG mailing list is not exactly overloaded with posts, how about consolidating TDWG's mailinglists into just 3? An announcement list for TDWG business (tdwg+process), a technical one (TAG,GUID+TAPIR) and just a single content one. This would probably also help to avoid duplication of efforts and to produce more consistent results across the subgroups.
Just an idea. Markus
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo
On Dec 1, 2008, at 13:29, Holetschek, Jörg wrote:
Tomas,
there's a wiki you might find interesting: http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/ But as far as I know, this is the only mailing list alive for discussions like that...
Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: bar tomas [mailto:bartomas@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 13:13 An: Holetschek, Jörg Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
Thanks for all your help. One last question: is there a mailing list for specifically discussing conceptual aspects of Darwin Core, ABCD, etc (I haven't been able to find one) or is Tapir mailing list for that purpose? Thanks T. Bar
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Holetschek, Jörg <j.holetschek@bgbm.org
wrote: Dear Thomas,
the ABCD schema can handle such unbounded data - but the only TAPIR provider software that supports ABCD (pyWrapper) is not quite bug free. So you'd have to use the BioCASe protcol - which is apparently not your intention.
Cheers from Berlin, Jörg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org]Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson (GBIF) Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. November 2008 16:22 An: bar tomas Cc: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
This is correct... largely it is used for transfer of detailed single specimen records.
That is not so say you could not define some schema that reuses sections of DwC or the TDWG vocabularies - you probably would have to get into custom provider software in that case (although maybe the current tools would allow for it - Renato could give advice for TAPIRLink on this).
Cheers
Tim
Thanks a lot for the information.
I suppose when the record is composed of multiple specimens (whose number is recorded in ObservedIndividualCount) the individual attributes of each specimen (age, sex, maturity, etc) cannot be stored.
Tomas Bar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tim Robertson <trobertson@gbif.org> wrote:
Hi T. Bar You might consider the OBIS extensions for Darwin Core since you are concerned with marine stuff.
http://iobis.org/obis/obis.xsd
SampleSize: the size of the sample from which the collection/observation was drawn. It can be a volume (e.g. for a phytoplankton sample), a linear distance (e.g. for a visual transect or net haul), a surface area (e.g. for a benthic core), etc. This field must also include the units, e.g. 200 mfor a transect, or 0.25 m^2 for a benthic grab (use ^ to denote a superscript). Note that when multiple collections/observations are reported from the same physical sample, a code identifying the sample can be placed in the Field_Number field to allow all collections/observations from a single sample to be connected.
IndividualCount is a count of specimens (e.g. not a count of species). If you want to indicate multiple species, then you would have a record for each along with the identification and the count of individuals of that species.
So in the OBIS schema you have:
ObservedIndividualCount: The number of individuals (abundance) found in a collection/record event.
Cheers,
Tim
On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:05, bar tomas wrote:
Sorry if this question is misplaced in this discussion list, but I haven't been able to find a mailing list on the conceptual aspects of Darwin Core.
I am interested to know if there are any recommendations on how to represent abundance in Darwin Core. I have seen some datasets using IndividualCount and SampleSize. For instance, for a fishing survey, would you use IndividualCount for the number of species in a catch, and SampleSize for the distance towed?
Thank you very much _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
____________________________________________________________ Tim Robertson Systems Architect Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat (GBIF) Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark http://www.gbif.org trobertson@gbif.org Phone: +45 35 32 14 87 (Office) Fax: +45 35 32 14 80 ____________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
Make that 3 votes total. Roger On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:03, Tim Robertson wrote:
+1 vote ------------ +2 (total)
On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:59, Markus Döring (GBIF) wrote:
As the average TDWG mailing list is not exactly overloaded with posts, how about consolidating TDWG's mailinglists into just 3? An announcement list for TDWG business (tdwg+process), a technical one (TAG,GUID+TAPIR) and just a single content one. This would probably also help to avoid duplication of efforts and to produce more consistent results across the subgroups.
Just an idea. Markus
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo
On Dec 1, 2008, at 13:29, Holetschek, Jörg wrote:
Tomas,
there's a wiki you might find interesting: http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/ But as far as I know, this is the only mailing list alive for discussions like that...
Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: bar tomas [mailto:bartomas@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 13:13 An: Holetschek, Jörg Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
Thanks for all your help. One last question: is there a mailing list for specifically discussing conceptual aspects of Darwin Core, ABCD, etc (I haven't been able to find one) or is Tapir mailing list for that purpose? Thanks T. Bar
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Holetschek, Jörg <j.holetschek@bgbm.org
wrote: Dear Thomas,
the ABCD schema can handle such unbounded data - but the only TAPIR provider software that supports ABCD (pyWrapper) is not quite bug free. So you'd have to use the BioCASe protcol - which is apparently not your intention.
Cheers from Berlin, Jörg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org]Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson (GBIF) Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. November 2008 16:22 An: bar tomas Cc: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data
This is correct... largely it is used for transfer of detailed single specimen records.
That is not so say you could not define some schema that reuses sections of DwC or the TDWG vocabularies - you probably would have to get into custom provider software in that case (although maybe the current tools would allow for it - Renato could give advice for TAPIRLink on this).
Cheers
Tim
Thanks a lot for the information.
I suppose when the record is composed of multiple specimens (whose number is recorded in ObservedIndividualCount) the individual attributes of each specimen (age, sex, maturity, etc) cannot be stored.
Tomas Bar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tim Robertson <trobertson@gbif.org
wrote:
Hi T. Bar You might consider the OBIS extensions for Darwin Core since you are concerned with marine stuff.
http://iobis.org/obis/obis.xsd
SampleSize: the size of the sample from which the collection/observation was drawn. It can be a volume (e.g. for a phytoplankton sample), a linear distance (e.g. for a visual transect or net haul), a surface area (e.g. for a benthic core), etc. This field must also include the units, e.g. 200 mfor a transect, or 0.25 m^2 for a benthic grab (use ^ to denote a superscript). Note that when multiple collections/observations are reported from the same physical sample, a code identifying the sample can be placed in the Field_Number field to allow all collections/observations from a single sample to be connected.
IndividualCount is a count of specimens (e.g. not a count of species). If you want to indicate multiple species, then you would have a record for each along with the identification and the count of individuals of that species.
So in the OBIS schema you have:
ObservedIndividualCount: The number of individuals (abundance) found in a collection/record event.
Cheers,
Tim
On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:05, bar tomas wrote:
Sorry if this question is misplaced in this discussion list, but I haven't been able to find a mailing list on the conceptual aspects of Darwin Core.
I am interested to know if there are any recommendations on how to represent abundance in Darwin Core. I have seen some datasets using IndividualCount and SampleSize. For instance, for a fishing survey, would you use IndividualCount for the number of species in a catch, and SampleSize for the distance towed?
Thank you very much _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
____________________________________________________________ Tim Robertson Systems Architect Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat (GBIF) Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark http://www.gbif.org trobertson@gbif.org Phone: +45 35 32 14 87 (Office) Fax: +45 35 32 14 80 ____________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Hyam Roger@BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org http://www.BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org ------------------------------------------------------------- Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK Tel: +44 131 552 7171 ext 3015 Fax: +44 131 248 2901 http://www.rbge.org.uk/ -------------------------------------------------------------
+1 kudo Wouter _____ From: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Roger Hyam Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:07 PM To: Tim Robertson Cc: TAPIR mailing list Subject: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data Make that 3 votes total. Roger On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:03, Tim Robertson wrote: +1 vote ------------ +2 (total) On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:59, Markus Döring (GBIF) wrote: As the average TDWG mailing list is not exactly overloaded with posts, how about consolidating TDWG's mailinglists into just 3? An announcement list for TDWG business (tdwg+process), a technical one (TAG,GUID+TAPIR) and just a single content one. This would probably also help to avoid duplication of efforts and to produce more consistent results across the subgroups. Just an idea. Markus http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo On Dec 1, 2008, at 13:29, Holetschek, Jörg wrote: Tomas, there's a wiki you might find interesting: http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/ But as far as I know, this is the only mailing list alive for discussions like that... Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: bar tomas [mailto:bartomas@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 13:13 An: Holetschek, Jörg Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data Thanks for all your help. One last question: is there a mailing list for specifically discussing conceptual aspects of Darwin Core, ABCD, etc (I haven't been able to find one) or is Tapir mailing list for that purpose? Thanks T. Bar On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Holetschek, Jörg <j.holetschek@bgbm.org> wrote: Dear Thomas, the ABCD schema can handle such unbounded data - but the only TAPIR provider software that supports ABCD (pyWrapper) is not quite bug free. So you'd have to use the BioCASe protcol - which is apparently not your intention. Cheers from Berlin, Jörg -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org]Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson (GBIF) Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. November 2008 16:22 An: bar tomas Cc: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] Abundance data This is correct... largely it is used for transfer of detailed single specimen records. That is not so say you could not define some schema that reuses sections of DwC or the TDWG vocabularies - you probably would have to get into custom provider software in that case (although maybe the current tools would allow for it - Renato could give advice for TAPIRLink on this). Cheers Tim
Thanks a lot for the information.
I suppose when the record is composed of multiple specimens (whose number is recorded in ObservedIndividualCount) the individual attributes of each specimen (age, sex, maturity, etc) cannot be stored.
Tomas Bar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tim Robertson <trobertson@gbif.org> wrote:
Hi T. Bar You might consider the OBIS extensions for Darwin Core since you are concerned with marine stuff.
http://iobis.org/obis/obis.xsd
SampleSize: the size of the sample from which the collection/observation was drawn. It can be a volume (e.g. for a phytoplankton sample), a linear distance (e.g. for a visual transect or net haul), a surface area (e.g. for a benthic core), etc. This field must also include the units, e.g. 200 mfor a transect, or 0.25 m^2 for a benthic grab (use ^ to denote a superscript). Note that when multiple collections/observations are reported from the same physical sample, a code identifying the sample can be placed in the Field_Number field to allow all collections/observations from a single sample to be connected.
IndividualCount is a count of specimens (e.g. not a count of species). If you want to indicate multiple species, then you would have a record for each along with the identification and the count of individuals of that species.
So in the OBIS schema you have:
ObservedIndividualCount: The number of individuals (abundance) found in a collection/record event.
Cheers,
Tim
On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:05, bar tomas wrote:
Sorry if this question is misplaced in this discussion list, but I haven't been able to find a mailing list on the conceptual aspects of Darwin Core.
I am interested to know if there are any recommendations on how to represent abundance in Darwin Core. I have seen some datasets using IndividualCount and SampleSize. For instance, for a fishing survey, would you use IndividualCount for the number of species in a catch, and SampleSize for the distance towed?
Thank you very much _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
____________________________________________________________ Tim Robertson Systems Architect Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat (GBIF) Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark http://www.gbif.org <http://www.gbif.org/> trobertson@gbif.org Phone: +45 35 32 14 87 (Office) Fax: +45 35 32 14 80 ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir _______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir ------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Hyam Roger@BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org http://www.BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org <http://www.BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org/> ------------------------------------------------------------- Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK Tel: +44 131 552 7171 ext 3015 Fax: +44 131 248 2901 http://www.rbge.org.uk/ -------------------------------------------------------------
participants (5)
-
"Markus Döring (GBIF)" -
Holetschek, Jörg -
Roger Hyam -
Tim Robertson -
Wouter Addink