Dear All,

I finally spend some time going through the thread on GBIF vs. TDWG, RDF vs. XML, and Provider-sided querying vs. Cache-only. My impression is that at this point in time we have to keep options open, particularly if they work and have been advertised widely. I think that our main problem remains the mobilisation of data. We have to convince people (i.e. institutions, organisations, and individual researchers and amateurs) to make their data freely available. This has to be taken into account when devising the technical strategies.

Provider-sided querying and rich-data definitions provide an immense potential for future (unforeseen) applications and research questions. [I think it was not mentioned that they also allow in-house networking of data sources, a problem many institutions have, e.g. with various collection databases brought in by collectors or curators.] This component should be maintained and incorporated into the overall strategy.

Centralised architechtures are necessary to get things moving rapidly, demonstrating particularly to (potential) data providers that their contribution is taken up and used. They are also necessary to achieve fitness-for-purpose in a wide variety of potential applications (through selective caching and quality enhancements in the indexing process). I think a cache toolkit is thus a priority. It should facilitats the creation of a quality-enhanced cache for specialised purposes while offering an interface for (cascading) provider control as well as a feedback mechanim to communicate possible quality enhancements to providers. Organisations such as GBIF, OBIS, BioCASE as well as national networks are tackling this problem - but we should do everything possible at this time to ensure that they use a common infrastructure.

GBIF is clearly our great and unique chance to get things moving. I doubt that we will get a global infrastructure to funciton if GBIF fails. So making GBIF work is certainly a priority also for TDWG. I think in both organisations we need to keep the vision alive, apart from having to solve the imminent problems.

Again, my personal view is that it is very important to continue focussing on data mobilisation - there are enormous amouts of data on specimens, observations [automatic recordings, fotographs, monitoring data, ...] out there which are still recorded, stored and distributed for special purposes only. To get people on board, it is important to provide services directed at the same people who provide the data.

Best wishes

Walter