Is it "requiered" what I understand? I mean... how do you want to enforce this? If there is no way to enforce it why dont just use accepted/denied? Or even better: true, false Cheers. On 8/2/06, John R. WIECZOREK <tuco@berkeley.edu> wrote:

I like Renato's suggestion as well.

On 8/2/06, "Döring, Markus" <m.doering@bgbm.org> wrote:

...

that sounds best to me so far. yes, any other suggestion?

-- Markus

...

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org ] Im Auftrag von Renato De Giovanni Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38 An: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology

Markus,

How about defining a controlled vocabulary? <operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]"> -- Renato

On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:

...

hi, I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the capabilities that tells others if this provider wants to receive log-only requests. How should we call it?

<operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true"> <operations logRequestsAccepted="true">

...

From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired". Any preferences or different suggestions?

regards -- Markus

_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir

_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir

_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir