Hi TAG, we had talked about proxying some of the rs.tdwg.org subversion site to different google code projects. I have setup 2 test proxies for darwin core and the new ontology project using these URLs:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc2/terms/index.htm http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/
I wasnt sure if this solution was fully agreed on at TDWG, so I am seeking for advice. I very much like this solution, which gives us the advantage of having google code exposed via the tdwg.org domain. And it frees us from having to sync different copies.
If there are no objections I would love to replace the /dwc and potentially also the /ontology part of rs.tdwg.org. But before making this switch some files on google seem to need adjustments in regards of absolute/relative links and html redirects.
Markus
Hi Markus,
Thanks for this.
One thing we need is a rewrite rule to do
http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/voc/TaxonConcept
to
http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/voc/TaxonConcept.rdf
as the namespaces hide the file extension. The extension should probably actually be .owl now and may be something else in the future I guess.
The other thing that may need discussing is that we lose the human readable form by making this move.
Should we generate OWL docs or something similar? They could be hosted almost anywhere and we could have a comment in the head of the files telling people to go there.
Roger
On 30 Nov 2009, at 16:46, Markus Döring (GBIF) wrote:
Hi TAG, we had talked about proxying some of the rs.tdwg.org subversion site to different google code projects. I have setup 2 test proxies for darwin core and the new ontology project using these URLs:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc2/terms/index.htm http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/
I wasnt sure if this solution was fully agreed on at TDWG, so I am seeking for advice. I very much like this solution, which gives us the advantage of having google code exposed via the tdwg.org domain. And it frees us from having to sync different copies.
If there are no objections I would love to replace the /dwc and potentially also the /ontology part of rs.tdwg.org. But before making this switch some files on google seem to need adjustments in regards of absolute/relative links and html redirects.
Markus
tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
I agree with having a single repository for the DwC.
Can you be explicit about what you mean by replacing the /dwc? If that changes it will affect every URI in the standard. That wouldn't be so good.
The other thing to work out would be development branches.
In the meantime, I will continue to publish commits to both the code site and rs.tdwg.org Subversion repositories.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:46 AM, "Markus Döring (GBIF)" mdoering@gbif.org wrote:
Hi TAG, we had talked about proxying some of the rs.tdwg.org subversion site to different google code projects. I have setup 2 test proxies for darwin core and the new ontology project using these URLs:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc2/terms/index.htm http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/
I wasnt sure if this solution was fully agreed on at TDWG, so I am seeking for advice. I very much like this solution, which gives us the advantage of having google code exposed via the tdwg.org domain. And it frees us from having to sync different copies.
If there are no objections I would love to replace the /dwc and potentially also the /ontology part of rs.tdwg.org. But before making this switch some files on google seem to need adjustments in regards of absolute/relative links and html redirects.
Markus
tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
Thanks for this. It allows me here in Iran to consult this site without going through the tedious remote login process.
Although I still need to take the letter to participate in the discussions, but that's a very good step.
Donat
-----Original Message----- From: tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of John R. WIECZOREK Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:33 PM To: Markus Döring (GBIF) Cc: Technical Architecture Group mailing list Subject: Re: [tdwg-tag] proxying rs.tdwg.org to google code
I agree with having a single repository for the DwC.
Can you be explicit about what you mean by replacing the /dwc? If that changes it will affect every URI in the standard. That wouldn't be so good.
The other thing to work out would be development branches.
In the meantime, I will continue to publish commits to both the code site and rs.tdwg.org Subversion repositories.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:46 AM, "Markus Döring (GBIF)" mdoering@gbif.org wrote:
Hi TAG, we had talked about proxying some of the rs.tdwg.org subversion site to different google code projects. I have setup 2 test proxies for darwin core and the new ontology project using these URLs:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc2/terms/index.htm http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/
I wasnt sure if this solution was fully agreed on at TDWG, so I am seeking for advice. I very much like this solution, which gives us the advantage of having google code exposed via the tdwg.org domain. And it frees us from having to sync different copies.
If there are no objections I would love to replace the /dwc and potentially also the /ontology part of rs.tdwg.org. But before making this switch some files on google seem to need adjustments in regards of absolute/relative links and html redirects.
Markus
tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
participants (4)
-
"Markus Döring (GBIF)" -
Donat Agosti -
John R. WIECZOREK -
Roger Hyam