Im looking into the archiving issue right now. As Stan pointed out both lists still exist as you can see here: http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo
Markus
On Oct 6, 2010, at 22:04, Blum, Stan wrote:
TDWG-TAG was not to be decommissioned.
If this discussion on TDWG-Content is not being archived (as Alrin noticed), then there was a glitch in the reconfiguration. I think (hope) Markus can look into that tomorrow.
Addressing Markus’ earlier question, I don’t think this is boring to people interested in TDWG-Content. It will just need to be explained and/or summarized to those not fully aware of the technical issues, particularly if we reach a consensus. A regular restatement of the choices and issues helps to keep people focused.
-Stan
On 10/6/10 11:52 AM, "Peter DeVries" pete.devries@gmail.com wrote:
I think the tdwg-tag list was shutdown as part of a effort to condense the tdwg lists to those that had traffic?
- Pete
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Markus Döring m.doering@mac.com wrote:
I am wondering if this discussion and similar rdf, lsid topics should continue on tdwg-tag rather than tdwg-content. We might bore quite a few people...
_______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content