Yes, we tried and it works. Thats the reason why we had to adapt for multiple namespaces some time ago. But you can not specify the typical GML app schema, I had to do the same as with RDF, you have to create a fake schema that simulates it. But we learnt some time ago that this legal :) Also consider that being able to produce a valid GML app schema as output doesnt mean TAPIR has WFS support! But is a good begining :) Cheers. On 8/3/06, Roger Hyam <roger@tdwg.org> wrote:
Hi Tapir Guys,
One quick question: Will TAPIR be able to produce valid GML as an output model. i.e. if I specify a simple GML application schema as a output model should it work? Has anyone done this?
I presume that if it works as an output model I can also use it as a conceptual schema and just ask for the default mappings.
Thanks,
Roger
--
------------------------------------- Roger Hyam Technical Architect Taxonomic Databases Working Group ------------------------------------- http://www.tdwg.org roger@tdwg.org +44 1578 722782 -------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir