Thanks for forwarding this Sally.
What I am proposing at St Louis - though I seem to been having to propose it long before - is that we have an application for managing the ontology that will expose the underlying semantics in multiple 'formats' i.e. as RDFS or OWL ontologies as GML application schemas, as custom XML Schemas as OBO ontologies etc etc. I see no other way of integrating multiple technologies. (Suggested alternatives welcome).
One of the things on my list is micro formats along with tagging. It seems crazy to define a 'specificEpithet' in a TDWG ontology and then not use exactly the same concept in a micro format or as a tag.
So this is timely. I just can't act on it very well before St Louis. I'll add something to the wiki page to flag my/our interest.
Thanks,
Roger
Sally Hinchcliffe wrote:
Hi all
This is probably on the wrong list (Maybe TAG?) but it strikes me that what this guy needs is an ontology that he can use in his microformats ...
Possibly an example of a real world need for ontologies ?
Sally
------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:34:04 -0000 To: sh00kg@rbgkew.org.uk Subject: Fwd: [TDWG] Announce: Proposal for "microformat" for marking-up taxonomic names in HTML: comments and contributions sought From: M.Jackson@kew.org Send reply to: M.Jackson@rbgkew.org.uk
Sally,
Do you think you might respond to this? Just curious what you think.
Mark
Forwarded From: Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk
Hello - my first post to this mailing list.
I'm not a taxonomist, but I've been told by one that you might be interested in recent proposals for a formula (a "microformat" http://microformats.org) for marking-up, in HTML, the names of species (and other ranks, varieties, hybrids, etc.).
Microformats are a way of adding additional, simple markup to human-readable data items on web pages, using common and open HTML standards, so that the information can be extracted by software and indexed, searched for, saved, cross-referenced or aggregated. Microformats are also open standards, freely available for anyone to use.
The proposed format respects all existing biological taxonomies, and is not intended to change or supplant any of them - it merely provides webmasters with a method of either:
- marking-up a taxonomical name (or taxon-common name pair) in such a way that its components can be recognised by computers
or
- marking up a common name, so as to associative with it a taxonomical name, in such a way that the latter's components can be recognised by computers
For instance, if I mark up a list of common names on a page I maintain:
http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/staffs/tittesworth/latest.htm
using that microformat, a visitor might have browser tool which lists all the species on the page, sorted into alphabetical order within taxonomic class, or in taxonomic order, and then creates links to, say (for Joe Public) their entries in Wikipedia, or the British Trust for Ornithology, or (for scientists) some academic database of the users choosing.
Early thoughts on the format are on an editable "wiki", here:
<http://microformats.org/wiki/species>Please feel free to participate - the proposal needs both messages of support (particularly from people or organisations who have websites on which they might use them) and, especially, comments and constructive criticisms - does the proposal understand and use taxonomy correctly; is the terminology right, are there any omissions or overlooked, unusual naming conventions?
You can use the above wiki, or the microformats mailing list:
<http://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists>and/ or please feel free to pass this e-mail to other interested parties.
Thank you.
-- Andy Mabbett Birmingham, England
TDWG mailing list TDWG@mailman.nhm.ku.edu http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/tdwg