I would add that once we do have a standard (my charter is under consideration), we should remove the antiquated references to avoid confusion and promote the actual standard.

2007/4/20, Renato De Giovanni < renato@cria.org.br>:
Hi Markus,

I never used the "old" DarwinCore concepts with TapirLink, except for
testing the import of DiGIR PHP configuration. I also don't know if
somebody is using it.

Anyway, since someone already had the work of adding all DarwinCore
concepts in the CNS file, I would suggest to keep them there. At
least while the new Darwin is still under the standardization
process. But we should definitely rename the label and maybe add some
comments there - the old DarwinCore is being shown with a greater
version than the new one...

Regards,
--
Renato

On 19 Apr 2007 at 18:00, Markus Döring wrote:

> Ive been reconfiguring my tapirs here today and stumbled quite often
> across "old" mappings to darwin core 1.0 with NS http://digir.net/
> schema/conceptual/darwin/2003/1.0. Those concepts are also in the
> standard TDWG alias.txt file. What do you think, is there still any
> need for it with TAPIR or can we remove all reference to the old
> darwin core and only work with the new one? Anybody of course is free
> to do create his own alias.txt and models, but should TDWG still
> provide support for this?
> --
> Markus

_______________________________________________
tdwg-tapir mailing list
tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir