On 19 Sep 2005, at 12:59, Michael Malicky wrote:
ad. 3)
Just a simple statement, as Peter already pointed out, by using Linnean code carefully and with high quality within our databases, we have already a working GUID in place! The thing Linne has already invented. IMHO it is only a question of database quality, whether the info given is a realy GUID or only a part of it.
Existing taxonomic names are not GUIDs (Globally Unique Identifiers), in that they are not always globally unique. There are numerous generic and higher level names that are the same for plants and animals, and even some species names, e.g. Agathis montana, which is the name of both a wasp and a tree. Failure to grasp this point has doomed some efforts to put taxonomy on the web, such as Wikispecies (http://species.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page), and the Tree of Life pages (http://tolweb.org/tree/). These sites use names to identify pages, leaving them open to the problem of homonyms.
Regarrds
Rod
Professor Roderic D. M. Page Editor, Systematic Biology DEEB, IBLS Graham Kerr Building University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QP United Kingdom
Phone: +44 141 330 4778 Fax: +44 141 330 2792 email: r.page@bio.gla.ac.uk web: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html reprints: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/pubs.html
Subscribe to Systematic Biology through the Society of Systematic Biologists Website: http://systematicbiology.org Search for taxon names at http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/portal/
___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com